» Story
 
  SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Expelled for having a beard? Ridiculous, says court
Rubian Khan Shapoo, A Vaidyanathan, Friday September 11, 2009, New Delhi, Bhopal
NDTV Group Editor English, News Barkha Dutt had put a question before Md Salim who was barred by his school for growing beard: So is the beard so important to you that you don't go to school because you are not allowed to keep one?

Md Salim: "I will die but not give up my beard. It's a matter of my faith, it's in my religion."

But now, Salim can go back to school and yes, he can keep his beard.

The Class 10 student was expelled by the Nirmala Convent School in Madhya Pradesh's Vidisha district as he refused to shave his beard.

But on Friday the Supreme Court in an interim order slammed the school saying:

"... tomorrow you will say Sikh students will not be admitted, no fair-complexioned student should be allowed. Nowadays, wearing ear-rings is in fashion. Then students with ear-rings will not be allowed. Prima facie, it's ridiculous."

"One year of precious time was last for the boy. Ultimately, Supreme Court appreciated the problem and gave justice to the boy," said B A Khan, senior advocate.

Last year after the school expelled Salim, he moved Madhya Pradesh High Court but lost the case.

Then he came to Supreme Court, here too, his petition was dismissed.

In a controversial observation, Justice Markandeya Katju had said: "Talibanisation of the country cannot be permitted."

This created a flutter, later Justice Katju apologised and withdrew the dismissal order after which another bench heard the case.

The school says it will respect the Supreme Court order and Salim is only too happy to be vindicated.

"Happy to go back to school after Id," said Md Salim.

Salim does not understand the fuss over a simple beard but the debate continues - does an individual's religious right clash with secular ethos.
 
 
More »
 
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend     
Comments: Read | Post
Tags: beard, convent school, Madhya Pradesh, Mohammed Salim, Supreme Court
Comments
Posted by shariq on Sep 24, 2009
NO, definitely not, a person's religious rights does not clash with secular ethos, if you are truly secular. India is a secular state and by that it is meant that an individual can freely exercise his religion. Why did Mr. Markandeya think that keeping a beard is talibanization. Its not only him, every one thinks like that if a muslim keeps beard, wears a cap( that white round one), has his trousers which are above ankle, he is an extremist. In its literal sense its not wrong to be an extremist, well you are following religion to the extreme or completely, but if you equate extremist to talibans then extremism is wrong. Why doesn't one consider a sikh to be an extremist when he wears a turban. because all of the sikhs wear it so its considered compulsory, so people don't object to it. But since few muslims wear cap so if a muslim wears it, he is considered an extremist or too religious. whats wrong in being religious or too religious. I think its all the reaction what we recieve when we cast a suspicious look over them. I am a muslim and i am saying we coz its applicable everywhere, even muslims despise muslims for this. we need to change our mindset and see an individual as an individual. respect his feelings, understand him. then only we can expect for a better future.
Posted by Indian on Sep 12, 2009
The revised judgment shows that previous judgment was unconstitutional and Justice Ktje should should be dealt as criminal. He should be trailed and punished in the court of Law to hurt the sentiment of Muslims and talk against the most important ritual of one religion. As first step he should be sacked with immediate effect by the president and should set an example for other judges to bring them in their limit.
Advertisement
Advertisement
On Facebook