»  Live from the Newsroom  »   Post
Live from the newsroom
Wednesday April 8, 2009 , India
For anyone who knows me, the thought of me writing a blog is an unreal one. I'm a technologically challenged citizen of this increasingly net driven world,  I don't carry a blackberry and reluctantly acquired a laptop a few years ago. However, here's why I've joined the blogosphere....at a time when TV news is more in your face than ever, there seems to be an increasing distance between our viewers and the journalists and editors who drive the news.
 
So, here goes, an attempt to open a direct communication line between me and all of you out there who love, hate, or are plain indifferent to news TV, but have a zillion questions about the process and news selection and don't know who to ask.
 
Perhaps the most difficult part of the job ( and the most exhilarating ) is choosing the news. Deciding whether the death of five newborns in a Patiala hospital because of sheer negligence is the main headline or a Pakistan claim that Bangladesh is behind 26/11.
 
In the end, there is no one right answer, it's a decision driven by editorial instinct, discussed or to be more accurate 'slugged out' between 2 or 3 senior editors. For me, the indisputable 'big' stories last week : In Bhopal, a labourer attempting to kill himself, his wife and four daughters, because of poverty. Two of the little girls have died, the others are fighting for life. His three sons were left untouched. It's a story from which no easy conclusions can be drawn, did he try to kill his little girls, because he felt they wouldn't be able to manage without their parents, why have child after child when his meagre earnings could barely support two people and where is the state and its poverty alleviation programmes ? Missing in action. Ironical with a chief minister who has won a second term on the development mantra.
 
However, this is exactly the kind of story that is hard to represent in a one and a half minute news story, it doesn't give us a new 'headline' every day, yet we will try to ensure it is showcased and the plight of these children through the next few weeks. So, while its been a newspacked time, from the 'million dollar men' of the IPL, to the release of Pakistan's controversial nuclear scientist and the back and forth of the Indo Pak blame game, its often the story of one family that illustrates the whole India vs Bharat conundrum. But, here's my take on it and on a new series we are planning. India IS Bharat. The two sides are not pitted against each other, what's needed is a greater realisation, that the story of Shafiq and his seven children is also India's story. So is Lalit Modi's cricket extravaganza. Our India has to be more inclusive of both.
 
   SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Comments: Read | Post
Comments Post your comments
 
Posted by Aditi Arur on Jun 21, 2009
On Twitter I see people from North America and Europe supporting the Iranians, giving them courage, soul-searching, feeling for them as one human being feels for another. I see pictures of protests of people in these countries who are supposedly anti-Muslim, anti-East crying for them, praying for them. I see students holding posters for the Iranian students, identifying with them, willing them to be brave, wishing they could do more for their new-found friends. And I see my students, from India and Pakistan- countries who claim to be democratic, who claim to respect free media and free speech. They are not just ignorant about what%u2019s going on, they just don%u2019t care. They cannot be inspired by youngsters going out in the face of death to fight for basic rights. They cannot be shocked by a girl being shot in the heart. They cannot be moved by the crowds chanting for freedom in unison. I can even understand why the governments are silent, but why are the students silent, why are the people silent? I thought youth is supposed to represent hope and change. Why are the youth so cynical, uncaring, indifferent in India and Pakistan? Why are they lifeless and so uninspired? If the youth is like this, what can one expect anything from the rest of the population? If the media is so concerned about TRP ratings, how can we expect them to inform the people about a revolution taking place next door? Never have I felt so alienated from my countrymen nor as ashamed. What happened to that generation which gave up their lives for the sake of freedom? Or does India care about freedom, liberty and human rights only when it comes to Indians? Does India care about racism only when Indians are discriminated? Does India care about terrorism only when it happens on Indian soil? Does India care only about cricket? Does India care only about Bollywood? Where are those Muslims who are forever ready to condemn the West for violence against Muslims? Or do they believe it is justified when Mullahs kill Muslims? Obama spoke when he had to, and you said you want action, not words.
 
Posted by Jasbir S Chugh on Jun 07, 2009
Oz attacks:Indian Government not doing enough Except initial response when Indian P.M.talked to his Australian counterpart,the Indian Government seems to have washed it's hands of the problem of racial attacks on Indian students in Australia.Our Government must put pressure on OZ Government to take stern and sincere steps to curb racial violence against our students. Just a telephonic talk or issuing customary statements by our leaders is not enough.A high profile delegation led by Indian foreign Minister must visit Australia and have a straight talk with Australian Government. It be may required to build an International pressure on Australia against these attacks on Indians.The matter should be raised even in UN to exert pressure on Australians for stopping this madness.Even if these attacks are not racial as claimed by OZ authorities,it is their moral duty to protect life and property of foriegn students who are paying hefty amounts to Australian Universities. Some of the degrees got from underated Universities are not even accredited in Australia itself for jobs.International students are contributing to nearly 1/3 rd of OZ economy. It is in OZ's own Interest to protect these students from any racist or criminal onslaughts.
 
 
Posted by Kapil Kapoor on May 29, 2009
Hi... I just would like to say that currently the biggest issue which should be raised concerns over & debated in media so as to make aware the indian citizens to overcome the struggles to work or study overseas. So i would kindly request you to take the matter of this issue as news create concerns & force our government to take diligent steps
 
Posted by chander prakash on May 28, 2009
is any body keeping an eye on china...the entire neighbourhood of india is inflamed ... also parts of india are waiting to do so...is chinas silence on issues of terrorism a ploy for self destruction of this region or is it a sinister behind the scene plot to push this region to a point from where it could manouever it to its advantage...what has china done in all these decades to control pakistan in its terrorist expanionist programmes...was it an instigator or a silent observor...i for one refuse to believe considering the relationship between china and pakistan that pakistan would turn a blind eye to GODFATHER chinese opinions...even obama is tackling pakistan in chinas neighbourhood without involving this giant...why...why is everybody keeping quiet and why oh why is china keeping quiet...does any body have an answer...AND IS INDIA WATCHING
 
Posted by Chandramouli on May 28, 2009
Why not have 30 mins in a day devoted to non-headline news. Im sure people would like it just like your documentaries are appreciated right now. 9:30PM/ 10:30 PM for this is not a bad idea either :)
 
Posted by Ram Ghasil on May 25, 2009
Lalit Modi or IPL has behaved antinational by moving IPL to S. Africa,they proved that for them Money if more importent than Patriotism. S.Africa or UK whold havd even never ever think of their criket matches to India, in any condition. The Media also behaved in same way. I rquest my India brothers and sister to bycot such events , because such peple or event don't deserve to be apriciated. I have not watched a single match and will neve ever watch any IPL match, just because of this anti national attitude. Jai Bharat. Vande matram.
 
Posted by dev on May 01, 2009
I totally agree with Sonia Singh. Sometimes certain stories don't get the right attention that it needs because of other 'bigger' issues. For example, recently a child named Shanno a class 2 student styding in a govt school died as the teacher had allegedly hit her for not doing her homework, and after 2 days a modern school student, Aakriti dies because of school's medical negligence, however, it was very sad to hear and read that Shanno's case didn't get that the media coverage, which Aakriti's case got. The media should hav supported Shanno's case more than Aakriti as the financial condition of the family is unsound. This was just an example to reflect the state of the media and the govt.I think the media should cover more stories featuring the 'real' India and not the 'ravish'India.
 
Posted by NYK on Apr 23, 2009
Completely agree with Sunitha. Show what the people like to see, that's the mantra for todays news channels. There are a few like NDTV who covers sensous news like farmer suicides and lack of development. But media will have to play a bigger role if it really wants to improve, force the administration to take steps towards such national issues. Story of shafiq or of the Bhopal labour is seen one day and forgotten the other day majority of us talk about it with pain, blame the government and move ahead. The media should highligh these stories continously so that some kind of pressure can be created on the politicians and adminitrators and wake them up from there sleep. Let's try to increase our countries (Trp)ratings too.
 
Posted by Sunitha on Apr 16, 2009
I am not a regular veiwer of news or TV for that matter. Kind off tuff finding time to watch after work (office and House). But i do catch the headlines, sometimes from my parents who want me to be up-to-date and sometimes from chatting with friends. Anyways, the though about how a news is selected is quite intriguing. How to choose which is more important. People will be more intrested(i think)in hearing about Lalit Modi's cricket extravaganza than in hearing the story of Shafiq. And it is better for the channel too right... i ask this as a doubt.. doesn't what the people would prefer to hear have a play in the news being selected. Then having other programmes focus on the smaller but more serious issues so that people can have the option to watch only if they are interested. I hope my doubt came across clear.
 
 
Post Your Comments Fields marked with * are mandatory
*Name:
E-mail:
*Comments:
  Limit 4000 characters - 4000 characters remaining
*Secure Code:
  Problem viewing this image. Click to refresh
 
 
Kindly do not post any defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful material or information. NDTV Convergence Ltd reserves the right to remove without notice any content received from users.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
About Me
Sonia Singh is the Managing Editor, NDTV 24x7.
Latest Posts
26/11: Remote-controlled from Pakistan
Their all-too-apparent indoctrination will make you shrink with fear. Hear, the original audio conversations of what happened during 26/11.
A govt in waiting: The saga continues
So, almost a fortnight after the results, in spite of the people giving the Congress-NCP a clear mandate, the result is a big zero.
Beyond Koda
So, the story of Madhu Koda is not just of a politician swindling crores, but of a wider loot and a deeper loss.