»  Worldly Wise  »   Post
The VIP syndrome
Monday July 27, 2009 , New Delhi, India

It was just as I thought it would be. Amidst all the rage over frisking of our former president, A P J Abdul Kalam himself never registered a protest. From whatever I have known of him through papers, one minor brush with him at the Ahmedabad airport following his visit to Gujarat after the 2002 riots and his books, I felt he would not have objected to going through a security check.

 

He comes across as a humble and learned man and he reflected the same when the incident happened at New Delhi. Perhaps he understands that the security requirements of the present time are much different from the law that was written in 1934. 9/11 had never happened then and certainly IC 814 had not been hijacked. He knew his responsibility and he acted accordingly.

 

While it can always be debated whether Kalam was particularly checked for the way his name sounds, we should also hope that other "VVIPs" act in the same dignified manner when asked for security checks. They are no super mortals and they need to realise that. In fact at a time when the agencies across the world use diplomatic channels to carry out espionage activities, it is time we think over a "VVIP" Act, written nearly seven decades ago. Our VVIPs are incensed because they consider themselves demi gods and frisking would dent that image. And therefore this entire song and dance.

 

We have always been complaining that most of the acts under our law are archaic. Then doesn't this act be one so as well? Shouldn't we work toward amending this too? The security needs have changed and so the act must change too.

 

Coming back to Kalam, he has again come forth as a model citizen and its not only MPs and VVIPs who should learn from him but we too need to realise that security checks help us. Be it at malls, stations or airports, if we complain about them, then we should not complain about terror acts.

 

And as far as getting even with America comes, we should frisk all VVIPs and could have done it when Hillary Clinton was in India. Remember the old adage? Don't get mad, get even. 

 
   SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Comments: Read | Post
Comments Post your comments
Showing 1-20 of 46
 
Posted by shadab khan on Aug 05, 2009
No issues with the president being frisked, he probably has to change his name. Remember the Airlines staff had to apologize tosome godman and his irate supporters for taking his trident away. finally they had to give the trident back to the godman.
 
Posted by Vinod on Aug 05, 2009
We need to get over this VIP syndrome. Everybody at airport is not expected to know Ex-President personally so if he is frisked, i don't think his stature goes down. Most of politicians and so called VIPs are criminals involved in one or other crimes and hence VIPS must be frisked.
 
 
Posted by Bharatwasi on Aug 05, 2009
Dear Shailendra, I disagree with your comments. It would have been OK, if the same principles were applied to American presidents and the heads of other states. This is nothing to do with security at all. Firstly, the whole business of checking passengers is completely rubbish. There are far more soft targets and terrorists will always find even clever tricks. Mumbai attack is one of the best examples of such cases. Now, as far as VVIPs are concerned, I have no problem in frisking celebrities. The PMs, presidents and ministers are not just VVIP figures, but represent the dignity of a nation. Searching a PM is like suspecting the dignity of that country. This is why the protocols exist. There has never been a case when a PM/president had hijacked a plane. They have far more responsibilities than doing this. Now, if the head of the state is a dictator, has a bad reputation or whose affairs are in question, there are various other protocols. For example in some cases, the government can deliberately deny entry for that person or the government may drop VVIP status and mark his visit as "personal". In that case, the person can be frisked normally. However, I think protocol should exclude ex-heads, ex-ministers, MPS and other celebrities. It should be limited to PM, President, cabinet ministers and CMs. at any time. However, as a flexibility a senior politician on an international mission may be awarded the status. For example, Vajpayee (although opposition leader) was heading the team at UNO when Narsimha Rao was PM. Considering all factors, it appears that there is no reason why Kalam should not be frisked at the airport. He was neither on any official visit nor representing India. However, it is still a serious matter if current protocol doesn't allow this. It shows that airlines can override government guidelines and protocols. The question still remains whether they will also frisk Mr. Bush as he is an ex-president now. If this was a mistake, an apology is OK. But, if this was deliberate, it is still serious. In long term though, government should limit the list and have mutual agreement with visiting countries before the travel. The government should also specifically inform the airline prior to the travel.
 
Posted by Arjun on Aug 05, 2009
I dont see what the fuss is about when A P J Kalam was frisked at the airport. He is not the President of India anymore but a citizen of India. We Indians have given him respect, not because that he was a former President, but he has done great research for the country. I respect him because he worked only to bring growth and change to the country and not because he was the President of India. Respect is never given, but it is earned. Since Kalam was now a normal citizen of the country and not the President, it was not against the code of conduct of the airlines to frisk him. If Mr. Kalam himself did'nt have any problem, then why do we have to be bothered about it?? And why should we give importance to former VIP's like Bill Gates?? He owns maybe the biggest companies in the world.. does'nt mean he's is'nt a normal citizen!!!!
 
Posted by smitha on Aug 04, 2009
The law should be the same same for all,be it a beggar on the road or a millionaire in his limo..be it a common man or a high flying politician..well, if America made it manditory to frisk our VVIPs ,then we should too ammend our outdated rules,make new clauses and frisk each and every VVIP who enters our country.
 
Posted by K.Sundaram on Aug 04, 2009
Kalam was treated as any citizen would be treated. Where is any insult in it. Kalam is beyond such things. Anyone who thinks he can insult or diminish Kalam shows his own smallness and diminishes himself. Kalam, by submitting to his treatment as a citizen, has made every citizen of this country feel proud of both Kalam and his own self. I salute you, Dr.Kalam
 
Posted by Sakina Rizvi on Aug 03, 2009
Well I think it was all OK .The only reason for being upset is just that we all respect Dr.Kalam so much that we feel what all happened was an insult to him.And one more reason for anger is that"We" dont do the same to someone else's President or previous President.If we start doing the same;which is necessary;we wont be upset or angry any longer.We need to understand that "Security" for any nation is its prime concern and it should the same for our Nation.
 
Posted by VINAY on Aug 03, 2009
WHAT YOU SAID SHAILENDRA IS ABSOLUTLY SPOT ON. THERE IS NO PROBLEM FRISKING AND CHECKING FOR SECURITY REASONS, IM ALL UP FOR IT..ITS JUST THAT 60-70 YR OLD EX PRESIDENT OF INDIA BEING FRISKED IN THE WAY THE AIRLINES DID WAS NOT CORRECT.. I ALWAYS GET FRISKED IN TEH AIRPORT :)..NEVER COMPLAIN THOUGH... I FEEL MR KALAM DESREVES SOME RESPECT, ATLEAST ALLOW HIM TO TRAVEL WITHOUT BEING FRISKED....LETS GET EVEN FORM NOW ON #:)
 
Posted by Jaypriya on Aug 03, 2009
Well said Mr.Shailedra.After all it is a matter of security and I wonder why people fuss so much.
 
Posted by Lohit on Aug 02, 2009
I would love to have Indian Airlines staff searching George Bush or Tony blair.
 
Posted by karze on Aug 02, 2009
Indian are not ashamed when millions goes hungry, thousand are burnt by inlaw for failure to bring dowry or untouchable are discriminated for thousands of years or millions of children do child labour than attend school but we Indian are ashamed at all. So what is there to be ashamed when former president is frisked.
 
Posted by A. Jain on Aug 02, 2009
Everyone asks if former Presidents / Vice Presidents of US are frisked at airports. Yes they are. If you see the film "An Inconvenient Truth", you will notice Al Gore being frisked. So what's the big deal in a country of equals. I do not believe that Mr. Kalam is more equal than I am. So why should I be frisked and not he. In fact it is a well known fact that MPs & MLAs are more likely to be criminals than the rest of the Indians. Hence, MPs and MLAs should be frisked in more detail than other Indians.
 
Posted by Aditya Adhikari on Aug 01, 2009
" 9/11 had never happened then" why only 9/11 is so important to world. Over 100,000 people have been killed by the terrorists in India prior to 9/11 in the United States. India did not wake-up Indian politicians did not wake-up to the reality of terrorism and security of its public, 500,000 Pundits languish in the slums of Delhi. No we still talk about 9/11 in United States in India as the first act of terror. Let's talk about the 9/11 out of 2987 people killed that day about 270 were of Indian Origin and 118 of those were Indian Nationals. that is almost 10% of killed. yet the Person of Indian population is less than .001% of the entire US Population. Yet Indian Government did nothing for their families here in the US or in India. India needs to wake-up and get rid of the British Created Law. 1934 India was still a British Colony and the Law was not written for Indians it was written for rulers of the Indian subjects. India will be a better place for all Indians only when we have Laws Protecting and Promoting Indian Culture and History not celebrating and implementing what the last Ruler/Oppressors of India left behind.
 
Posted by ved on Aug 01, 2009
Very correct.Check them all.Someone might be carrying contrabands.Dont trust Indian politians.
 
Posted by satwinder singh on Aug 01, 2009
what is he going to do when he's in western countries. not get frisked b/c he's a vvip.
 
Posted by verghese PF on Aug 01, 2009
APJ kalam was the president of india now he is just a common man. hence he sould be treated like one and if he has been frisked at an airport i don't think there is any problem in that, if a common man is getting frisked. also i feel we are just makeing a mountain our of a mole hill.
 
Posted by Indraprakash Surya Gupta on Jul 31, 2009
Friends, Why was the former President of India traveling by a foreign airlines. It would have been better if he traveled in Air India or at least Jet Airways. Both Indian owned airlines have regular schedules for USA. It would have given a better example for Indians traveling abroad. I would like someone from Dr.Kalam's office to clarify the same.
 
Posted by Cyriac Joseph on Jul 30, 2009
The basic question is - does the airline have a uniform policy of frisking all passengers, irrespective of their nationalities, religion and position? If so, I see no grounds to object - ultimately the airline is responsible for ensuring the safety of its passengers and all policies contributing to this should be accepted by anybody using this airline. We Indians know Dr. Kalam and may be shocked by what happened, but I would prefer all VVIPs being subject to such security measures, rather than have a blanket ban on the frisking of VVIPs and ex-Presidents. Imagine the ex-President of a Taliban ruled country flying with you - would you be as ready to condone not frisking him on grounds that he is an ex-President? As they say - the line separating a freedom fighter and a terrorist is pretty thin!
 
Posted by Sivakumar on Jul 30, 2009
Hi, Mr.Kalam led a country of more than brilliant people.Will any airline carriers dare to frisk any US former presidents.This act disgraces the entire nation and the act of this kind undermines the people who elected him.By endorsing the view that our former president should be checked,it indirectly means that we have let us ruled by a man whom we do not believe(God,forgive me for this words against our honorable Kalam). A bharat ratna recipient,an eminent scientist and above all the former president of this great nation shouldn't be treated like this.For this act,it is even right to ban the carrier from operating over indian skies and ports for a considerable period.And please do not draw parallel between our kalam and other VVIPS.
 
Posted by AMIT KUMAR on Jul 30, 2009
can you ever trust our elected representatives, who have somehow managed to get where they are.can you trust them with not carry with them anything illegimate for money across borders. they are more than capable of doing such things and put reputation of our country in stake..check all!! for such a petty security check,why should they feel looked down upon if billion people of this nation dont.
 
 
Post Your Comments Fields marked with * are mandatory
*Name:
E-mail:
*Comments:
  Limit 4000 characters - 4000 characters remaining
*Secure Code:
  Problem viewing this image. Click to refresh
 
 
Kindly do not post any defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful material or information. NDTV Convergence Ltd reserves the right to remove without notice any content received from users.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
On Facebook
About Me
Shailendra Mohan is a Principal Correspondent who has been with NDTV for four years. He has worked in the field for over seven years. Shailendra covers city happenings and crime stories and has a keen interest in news and happenings around the world.
Latest Posts
The Untouchables: Bombay Police after 26/11
There is a story the officers of Bombay police like to tell: of brotherhood, risk and the fight against evil.
Ever-reddy
For the Reddys to be hailed as only the kings of Bellary, was galling. Their sights were set over controlling north Karnataka.
Tawang, in preparation
Tawang is in bridal makeup. Dressed for the occasion to receive their Spiritual Guru. It's a pretty picture of festivity.