»  Arms and the Men  »   Post
Double standards of the West
Monday June 1, 2009 , New Delhi, India

If ever there was a proof needed about the double standards applied by the Western nations in dealing with Asia and Africa, there is no better example than their reaction to the developments in Sri Lanka over the last fortnight.

Here's a nation that secured a hard-earned military victory over what was unarguably the world's most dreaded and ruthless terrorist group--the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam or LTTE. Banned in 26 countries across the globe, the Tamil Tigers, as the LTTE was also known, had a powerful naval arm, a rudimentary air wing and at least 25,000 infantry fighters backed like a conventional army with 155 mm artillery guns, multi-barrel rocket launchers, Universal machine guns and claymore mines among other small arms.

This was the outfit that gave the world the suicide vest and suicide belt that were responsible for the assassination of at least one President and a former Prime Minister across two nations, this was the group that killed and wounded at least 70,000 people over a quarter century; here was a group who's writ ran large over one-third of a sovereign nation. And to top it all, the LTTE had kept over 250,000 innocent, hapless Tamil civilians--women, children, the young and the old--hostage for over two years and mercilessly used them as an insurance against the advancing Sri Lankan army.

If ever there was a ripe case for a well-planned and executed military operation, here it was in Sri Lanka. President Mahinda Rajapakse and his team went about prosecuting what, by all accounts, was a legitimate war. But the world, the Western world went into an overdrive to stop Colombo. Norway, Sweden, UK and to a lesser extent the United States put pressure on Sri Lanka by various means. Some threatened to move a resolution in the UN, others lobbied to prevent a bailout package mooted by the International Monetary Fund for the war-ravaged country. Now, many have called for war crime investigations into the conduct of the Sri Lankan military.

Had it not been for countries like Russia, China and to an extent India, Sri Lanka would have suffered grievously at the hands of the so-called liberal lobby, ably aided and abetted by the 'bleeding-heart' liberals among the western media who think they are the judge, jury and executors when it comes to dealing with Asian and African nations. All of them had tried to stop the war in Sri Lanka, ostensibly to safeguard the civilians but in reality the efforts were directed at rescuing LTTE chief Vellupillai Prabhakaran and his top associates.

The simple and bitter truth is: the Western world has not been able to digest the fact that a small, underdeveloped nation like Sri Lanka has managed to defeat a terrorist group, a feat that they have not managed despite deploying huge resources and manpower across the globe.

For years, the US and the NATO countries have been trying to vanquish the Al Qaeda and the Taliban, without much success. In the past decade, the US and other western militaries, operating in Iraq and Afghanistan to take just two recent examples, have killed and maimed scores of civilians. But except for cursory apologies, none of these nations or the defenders of human rights operating from the safe havens of western capitals have bothered to even acknowledge their gross mistakes.

So why is it that a small nation's victory over terrorism "fit to be tried for war crimes," but a big bully's (like the US) blatant violation of human rights is part of a "necessary war on terrorism?" Why didn't any one of these defenders of human rights put pressure on the LTTE when it was taking hundreds of thousands of civilians along with it as it retreated during the war?

If ever there is a clear case of the western nations' hypocrisy, it is demonstrable here in India's backyard, in Sri Lanka. Let Washington and London and Bonn and Ottawa first look at their own conduct before trying to prosecute a small country for doing what any sovereign nation has a right to do.

(The author, NDTV's Defence Editor, reported the war in Sri Lanka from the conflict zone for the past six months)

 
   SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Comments: Read | Post
Tags: LTE , Sri Lanka , West

Comments Post your comments
Showing 21-40 of 142
 
Posted by arjun on Jun 03, 2009
that is a brilliant viewpoint ! i just loved it! hey man , dont care about the other stupid comments.. YOU ARE DAMN RIGHT !
 
Posted by aru pon natarajan on Jun 03, 2009
Western countries did right thing. They have a record of civilization that taught them the values, whereas countries like russia, china and india are still uncivilized in respect to human values. That's why they have supported the barbarian regime of M. Rajapakshe. if you justify the killing of innocent tamils by the "hitler" army of srilanka, then there is something wrong with your ideology. look at the way the srilankan army keeps the civilians in camps..
 
 
Posted by John on Jun 03, 2009
The Tamils, an ancient people, culture, language and literature, is respected in only one country - Singapore. Even in India, because the country is so diverse and complex, Tamils are just about tolerated. Look at what India did to the plight of Bengalis (another great people, language and culture) under ZA Bhutto's Pakistan, and what it did to the poor Tamils under the Sinhala control in Lanka. Double standards!
 
Posted by francis on Jun 03, 2009
An excellent article indeed. Any organisation which resorts to terror tactics should be eliminated. Rajiv Gandhi who sent the IPKF to SL for the protection of Tamils was rewarded with a garland of explosives. Hats off to the SL army for their excellent planning and precise execution. My heart goes out to all those who lost their near & dear ones. Human lives R precious and it should be protected . Let us think beyond national boundaries. Let there be no more loss of innocent lives. Let peace alone prevail...always.
 
Posted by Stud on Jun 03, 2009
If the west wanted to save Prabha, then why they had banned LTTE in their countries? Your so called 'perspective' is also one sided. Plz consider innocent people.
 
Posted by S. Vaidy on Jun 03, 2009
Dear Akshay, it%u2019s unfortunate that you are the only one defending the LTTE in this bunch. You should remember the kind of discrimination suffered by lower cast people in India at the hands of uppercast during pre-independence and early years of post independence. If they would have taken the arms like LTTE, imagine the state of India. Ofcourse there were imbalances in the past it can be rectified over the years but not thru militancy and overnight. You should remember that the Tamil population killed by LTTE is more than that of ethnic riots in 1958, 1977 ,1983 and the present one. Hence for GOD%u2019s sake please shred you wrong notion salute Sri Lanka Govt. for their good job.
 
Posted by Dinesh on Jun 03, 2009
The countries mentioned in this article and their media call themselves the International Community and have appointed themselves the arbiters of truth. They feel this is their God given right and any one who does not subscribe to this notion is immediatly villified and harrassed. As the Sri Lankan Ambassodor for the UN in Geneva said at the 11th special session of the UNHRC on Sri Lanka Quote"these are the same people who told the world that there are WMD's in Iraq". He further stated that "he would not trust them and buy a used car leave alone charges of War crimes" thses few words aptly describe these people.These countries are so hypocritical that it is not funny. Wonder why all these countries and their NGO Lackeys and their tame press do not ask for war crime investigations in Guantanamo, Iraq and Afghanistan. This article is one of very few in the world press that has portrayed the true nature of these hypocrits.
 
Posted by Thomas Vergis on Jun 03, 2009
Congtats to the author and best luck to Sri Lanka. A well written article on the state of events that happened. The Sri Lnakan govt and the people should be appreciated and assited.
 
Posted by RAVIKUMAR on Jun 03, 2009
You are appreciating the way of srilanka's war on LTTE. You knew very well that thousands of children and civilians lost their lives and lakhs of people kept in the jails(in the name of camps).Ofcourse, any terrorist organisation should not be allowed at any part of the world. We can win any type of war & terrosim by the way of Sri lanks's ruthless approach. Then what is the different between the terrorist group and civil administration. There should be tactics approach to win without causing any human lives.
 
Posted by bharath rasu on Jun 03, 2009
Nobody could have any doubt about LTTE as violent organisation. They deserve the fate. But the author conveniently forgot that half of the 70,000 civilian casualty is caused by SL army. Nearly 40,000 of the casualities were innocent Tamils. We all know that most of the terrorist attack on Indian soil is planned in pakistan, do you think it is possible and right decision to attack pakistan and kill innocent civilians there?. Why are we keeping quiet. Srilanka has blood in its hand by killing nearly 20,000 civilians. It is trying hard so that everybody get blood on their hands, so nobody can talk. I am worried we citizens of India is victimised into this thought. SL is very good not only in orchestrating SL media but Indian media too. Dont make blunder by simply supporting SL. This could be a blunder like Prabhakaran did by killing our beloved prime minister Rajiv gandhi. I wonder whether the author know the history of struggle in Srilanka. We all are jumping to the sky when our students are attacked in Australia. Imagine SL tamils faced 100 (could be 1000 times)time severe atrocities from their fellow countrymen. For long time they peacefully fighted against these atrocities. I can say SL had victory over minority Hindu tamils moment when they made sure non-violent struggle failed and people had to turn to violent organisations like LTTE. Long live so called "Democracy" hypocracy. Be proud of your article, but time will tell the truth.
 
Posted by Karthik G Rao on Jun 03, 2009
Dear Nitin, I completely agree with you. The West thinks that it can decide upon anything when it comes to the African & Asian regions. Countries like India should rather stand up to the right causes and not come under the Western political pressure. By all means your article reflects top class journalism
 
Posted by john on Jun 03, 2009
what srilankan goverment did is wrong and more wrong is Indian goverment keeping quite. Tamilan are been tourched there by srilankan government so there should be UN investagation.
 
Posted by sbala on Jun 03, 2009
A sinhala communist view well articulated. All rebellion against oppression, unless they are started by communists, is terrorism to these people. Similar one sided views are also expressed by the Capitalists. The matter is too simple and too obvious to be colour coated by such intelligent people using available media. The Sinhalese Buddhists oppressed the Tamil Hindus for over hundred years. The Tamils started their rebellion in the Gandhian way in the 60's and 70's. But the Sinhalese were barbarians, not civilised british. The oppression peaked in 80's. Tamils took to armed rebellion. It is one of the greatest liberation movements that the world has ever seen so far. Cuba, Algeria, Vietnam are examples of successful armed rebellion. Tamil Eezham will be cited in the history books as the most difficult of people's struggle against oppression.
 
Posted by najeeb on Jun 02, 2009
LTTE is eliminated - Sri Lanka can breath. 200000 IDPs %u a burden for SL. 20000 tamils massacred during the final phase of war. Figure conflicting. These are the problems SL face now. LTTE never believed in peace talks and believed to solve the matter militarily. Its wrong to pin point Sinhala chauvinism all the time being the reason for the formation of LTTE. Prabakaran took up arms to fight the SL army %u he fought and lost. Thats the bottom line. He took 200000 tamil people along with him (as human shields) into a small strip of land when the SL army came rampaging. He cut off and deprived water supply to 25000 farmers which lead to the commencement of war. He killed thousands of innocent civilians people dont seem to remember these things. Lets forget all these issues. Prabakaran should have entered into the peace talks with SL govt. to settle this issue. He should have given up Ealam and agreed to a political solution. If that was the case, by now, he and his close aides would be alive and many civilian deaths avoided. It%s never too late lay down your arms and enter into a negotiated settlement. We dont need another war and more deaths.
 
Posted by Prajnan Das on Jun 02, 2009
West does not want to see a prosperous Asia, and may be that is the reason behind the curtain of its hypocrisy. The West likes Pakistan a lot, a global sponsor of Terrorism. The holier than thou Western Media does not waste any time to criticize security actions taken by nations which do not fall in jurisdiction of the NATO%u2019s approval. Where were these so called great humanists when Serbia was bombed during the Yugoslav War? Russian Federation has no rights to fight Chechen terrorists and but the NATO is blessed with the ultimate protection to recklessly bomb civilian targets in Serbia and Iraq. LTTE was a threat not only to Sri Lanka; it was jeopardizing the entire South East Asia. This is indeed an insightful article, hoping to read more analysis of this genre.
 
Posted by R.C. Ramesh Chander on Jun 02, 2009
I am not sure in which world you were doing your reporting. Close to 20,000 innocent Tamils have been murdered by Rajappakshe and you call it a legitimate war. This jus shows you have no idea of the history of the Tamil struggle there. I am not supporting the LTTE but I just cannot digest the way you have written this articel. The 20,00 people killed, confirmed by UN and THE TIMES, UK were all innocent civilians and they had nothing to do with LTTE. This 20,000 is in jus the last 3 months. And the 70,000 you quoted in the article, is the total number to have died in the long 35 year struggel, and they were all killed by the Lankan Army.
 
Posted by S K Anand on Jun 02, 2009
Absolutely. It leaves me with two minds. When our so called "liberal" politicians are dilly dallying in prosecuting Afzal Guru & Kasab with strong obvious evidences, a great and valiant leader - Rajapakse - has taken a bold step to wither away one of dreaded terrorist organization which did nothing good to its so called tamils' liberation. Only few loony leaders from Tamil Nadu could support such a leader. Sri Lanka and Israel have in them what a big country like India terribly lacks. Rajapakse deserves to be applauded and honored for executing such a bold act. Western world - rather the white skin world - always wanted this part of asia and large parts of africa to remain at their foot and mercy and dance to their tunes. They act like "zamindars" of this globe which is highly unacceptable. We, India should support Sri Lanka for it was the same Prabhakaran who eliminated one of our most revered and enthusiastic leaders whose presence could have made a great difference during these times of economic and military uncertainty. Contrary to the Ramayana where Rama travels from "hindustan" to eliminate Ravana in Lanka, a "rama" was born in Lanka itself to eliminate this Ravana and bought peace for the common man. Hail Rajapakse and Hail Lankan Army. Down with the typical western domination.
 
Posted by John on Jun 02, 2009
The Tamils tragedy in Lanka has been unique. When the majority fundamentalist Buddhist Sinhalese started legislating (democratically!!!) laws in favour of themselves and against the Tamils, initially there were quiet a few parties, organisations, and fronts opposing it and fighting for the Tamil cause. But it was not one united group. The different groups fought amongst themselves and through brute power LTTE emerged as the only one. What a contrast this was to the Awami party and the Mukhtibahini of Bangladesh. Then again the Government of India got on the side of the Bangladesh liberation forces and the Indian Army was sent in to support the Bangladesh freedom movement. Whereas in the case of Tamils in Lanka the wily Jayewardene managed to manipulate young Rajiv Gandhi and got the Indian Army (IPKF) to fight against the Tamils and not for them! Unfortunately it didn't end there since the LTTE did the stupid act of getting Rajiv Gandhi assassinated. This only ensured that the Government of India from that point of time could never take a stance in favour of the LTTE and thus the Tamils of Lanka. Also though the LTTE were tough on their fighting, unlike the Islamists of the Middle East, didn't go and destroy the Twin Tower or anything else in the United States. Had they done it then the Americans would have said 'in the interest of the United Sates we will intervene in Lanka and perhaps create a Tamil Elam%u2019. Let us not forget that the Americans and Europeans (with NATO) did intervene in Serbia and created Kosovo, though in my opinion the Kosovans deserved less a country for themselves than the Tamils in Lanka. Again the West (Australia) was very enthusiastic in intervening in Indonesia and managed to create East Timor (the country the size of a football ground). And yet the world is not interested in doing justice for the Tamils of Lanka! The principle is important - Tamils - the language, the literature, the culture, etc. is truly great and ancient, and needs to be supported and preserved. Sinhala is part of the Sanskrit based language family which is so well established in the north of India. However the southern languages (Malayalam, Telugu, Tulu, Kannada and Tamil) are part of the Dravidian family. And historically there has been always a constant attempt by the northern family group (or the northerners) to erode the southern ones - i.e. language, culture, cuisines, music, literature, culture..... And yes, one needs to stand up for that. As BBC correctly reported %u2013 the Rajepaksha government stands for a unitary and theocratic (Buddhist) state, but the Tamils are for a secular and federal state. With the demise of Prabhakaran will the Tamils ever have an equal status in Lanka?
 
Posted by tamil on Jun 02, 2009
Tamils are different from Sinhalese in every way religion ethnicity ,language...etc. They lived as a separate nation till British arrived and left both Sinhalese and Tamils together. The just struggle for Tamils is branded as terrorism and destroyed and thousands bruatally murdered. My heart weeps. oh God where is justice. Will you not bring judgement upon these nations. Will not your anger pour upon these people.
 
Posted by chandramouli on Jun 02, 2009
Yes I agree 100% to the views. Rajapakshe should probably be given international atten tion for his dedicated approach to wipe out terrorism from Srilanka and this creates an enormous room for peace in the South Asian besides probably paving way for growth for Srilanka. I salute him for his ability to get this done what none of his predecessors failed to accomplish.
 
 
Post Your Comments Fields marked with * are mandatory
*Name:
E-mail:
*Comments:
  Limit 4000 characters - 4000 characters remaining
*Secure Code:
  Problem viewing this image. Click to refresh
 
 
Kindly do not post any defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful material or information. NDTV Convergence Ltd reserves the right to remove without notice any content received from users.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
On Facebook
About Me
A student of conflicts, insurgencies and wars, Nitin Gokhale has spent 26 years reporting on military and militants from various hostile fields like India's north-east, Kashmir valley, the Kargil war, China and Sri Lanka, among others. He's currently NDTV's Defence and Strategic Affairs Editor.
Latest Posts
The Untouchables: Bombay Police after 26/11
There is a story the officers of Bombay police like to tell: of brotherhood, risk and the fight against evil.
Ever-reddy
For the Reddys to be hailed as only the kings of Bellary, was galling. Their sights were set over controlling north Karnataka.
Tawang, in preparation
Tawang is in bridal makeup. Dressed for the occasion to receive their Spiritual Guru. It's a pretty picture of festivity.