» Story
 
  SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Rajkhowa in court: I have not surrendered
NDTV Correspondent, Saturday December 5, 2009,

It was a rare public glimpse of ULFA chairman and co-founder, Arabinda Rajkhowa, wanted for murder, kidnapping and extortion. Rajkhowa was finally produced in court after he refused to budge from his demand of sovereignty.

"Talks cannot happen with handcuffs on," said Rajkhowa.

As he was brought to be produced in the court, the ULFA chief also said that he had not surrendered.

NDTV has learnt that Rajkhowa spent the entire day in negotiations before he was produced at the magistrate's court for police custody.

As per sources, the government has made it clear it will not negotiate on sovereignty for Assam; Rajkhowa has to pledge that ULFA will abjure violence; and the government is ready to wait for a month for Rajkhowa to make up his mind.

There was a daylong spectacle for hundreds of people waiting to catch a glimpse of the man who founded the outfit, which dominated the socio-political landscape of Assam for the last three decades unleashing a reign of terror. Has the man now come to speak the language of peace or has the outfit run out of steam?

"Yes we are curious. We want to see him," said a local.

The big question now is that just who is calling the shots in the ULFA. On Saturday, the outfit's military chief Paresh Baruah denied reports of a rift.

In an open letter he said: "Reports of Rajkhowa surrendering are the divide and rule tactics of 'colonial' forces. There is no split in ULFA. Sovereignty is the only issue."

Despite the present roadblock, negotiators are hoping that Rajkhowa will see the writing on the wall and agree to talks.
 
 
More »
 
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend     
Comments: Read | Post
Tags: ULFA
Comments
Posted by Ritesh Baruah on Dec 09, 2009
@Mr. Vikram Singh, Who told you about the ground situation specially in Assam? Nobody is interested in getting separated from India - our motherland. People have realised for whose fault places like Assam have stayed behind - its the people themselves and the local leadership. Moreover, there is no support for ILFA at all in the present situation. The aspirations of people have grown multifold and they also want to develop along with other parts of India - and I have to say we are on the path. Rest, just to let all you know - the problem of Assam is not ULFA in present scenario - it is the Bangladeshi immigration problem that is creeping the people. Jai Hind, Jai aai Axom.
Posted by Vikram Singh, Patna on Dec 08, 2009
Like Subash Chandra Bose, Jagat Singh, Bhagat Singh fought for freedom from the English, Paresh Baruah, Arabinda Rajkhiwa are fighting for freedom from India. Somebody's terrorist is somebody's freedom fighter. You call them terrorist - its upto you. By teh way, as a freedom loving democratic coutry, is it morale for India to keep places like Kashmir, Assam/NE forecefully under its fold? Should we call these parts as 'integral part' of India when the local residents themselves like to be separate from India? "Who negotiates with a terrorist in custody?" - The answer lies with the problem that they have captured the leader, but hundreds of grass-root level fighters are on the groud. If they harm the leader, these fighters will become active and may create havoc all over Assam.
Advertisement
Advertisement
On Facebook