Five Judge Constitution Bench
-
{
- All
- News
- Videos
-
People Can Have Different Opinion: Article 370 Judge On Landmark Verdict
The unanimous judgment on Kashmir was the opinion of five judges and people can differ, Justice (Retd) SK Kaul, who was part of the constitution bench that delivered the verdict, told NDTV today.
-
Ayodhya Verdict: "Time For Healing, Big Relief...": Supreme Court Judge To NDTV On Ayodhya
After delivering a historic verdict in the Ayodhya case, one of the five judges in the Supreme Court Constitution bench said "it is time for healing."
-
Ayodhya Verdict: Security Increased For 5 Supreme Court Judges Delivering Ayodhya Verdict
The security of the five judges of the Supreme Court's Constitution Bench has been increased to Z Plus in view of its judgment in the Ayodhya temple-mosque title suit, which will be announced on Saturday.
-
UP Minister's "Supreme Court Is Ours" Remark Criticised By Chief Justice
Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi today condemned the claims of minister from Uttar Pradesh who claimed that the Ram temple the BJP promised in Ayodhya will be built, "since the Supreme Court is ours". "We deprecate such statements," said Chief Justice Gogoi, who is heading the five judge constitution bench that is hearing the case on title dispute on a ...
-
No Hearing In Ayodhya Case On Day 8 As Top Court Judge Is Unavailable
The hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case could not take place in the Supreme Court on Monday due to unavailability of one of the five judges of the Constitution bench.
-
Will There Be Mediation In Ayodhya Case? Supreme Court Decision Shortly
A five judge constitution bench will decide today whether the Ram temple issue that has been pending in courts for 60 years, can be solved by mediation.
-
The Reason Behind Justice UU Lalit's Exit From Ayodhya Case
The Ayodhya title dispute was deferred again today and posted to January 29 as one of the five judges in the constitution bench assigned the hear the case, Justice UU Lalit, dropped out. Justice Lalit recused himself because he had been a lawyer in a related case.
-
Ayodhya Hearing Deferred To January 29 After Top Court Judge Exits Case
The Ayodhya case in the Supreme Court was adjourned again today after the exit of one of the five judges in the constitution bench. Justice UU Lalit recused himself saying he had been a lawyer in a related case.
-
5 Judges To Rule On Polygamy, Why Only 3 For Ayodhya, Supreme Court Asked
A bench of five judges set up to decide if polygamy among Muslims is constitutionally valid was cited as a ground in the Supreme Court today to refer the Ayodhya land dispute to a larger bench. "Is the polygamy case more important than Ayodhya case? When polygamy can be referred to a Constitution bench, why not Ayodhya land dispute?" senior lawyer ...
-
Free Choice Or State Decision: Kapil Sibal Sharpens Argument On Aadhaar In Supreme Court
The legal challenge to the Aadhaar identification programme is the most important case ever heard by the Supreme Court, more important than the 1976 verdict in which the top court upheld suspension of fundamental rights during Emergency, senior lawyer Kapil Sibal told five judges of the Supreme Court today.
-
People Can Have Different Opinion: Article 370 Judge On Landmark Verdict
The unanimous judgment on Kashmir was the opinion of five judges and people can differ, Justice (Retd) SK Kaul, who was part of the constitution bench that delivered the verdict, told NDTV today.
-
Ayodhya Verdict: "Time For Healing, Big Relief...": Supreme Court Judge To NDTV On Ayodhya
After delivering a historic verdict in the Ayodhya case, one of the five judges in the Supreme Court Constitution bench said "it is time for healing."
-
Ayodhya Verdict: Security Increased For 5 Supreme Court Judges Delivering Ayodhya Verdict
The security of the five judges of the Supreme Court's Constitution Bench has been increased to Z Plus in view of its judgment in the Ayodhya temple-mosque title suit, which will be announced on Saturday.
-
UP Minister's "Supreme Court Is Ours" Remark Criticised By Chief Justice
Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi today condemned the claims of minister from Uttar Pradesh who claimed that the Ram temple the BJP promised in Ayodhya will be built, "since the Supreme Court is ours". "We deprecate such statements," said Chief Justice Gogoi, who is heading the five judge constitution bench that is hearing the case on title dispute on a ...
-
No Hearing In Ayodhya Case On Day 8 As Top Court Judge Is Unavailable
The hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case could not take place in the Supreme Court on Monday due to unavailability of one of the five judges of the Constitution bench.
-
Will There Be Mediation In Ayodhya Case? Supreme Court Decision Shortly
A five judge constitution bench will decide today whether the Ram temple issue that has been pending in courts for 60 years, can be solved by mediation.
-
The Reason Behind Justice UU Lalit's Exit From Ayodhya Case
The Ayodhya title dispute was deferred again today and posted to January 29 as one of the five judges in the constitution bench assigned the hear the case, Justice UU Lalit, dropped out. Justice Lalit recused himself because he had been a lawyer in a related case.
-
Ayodhya Hearing Deferred To January 29 After Top Court Judge Exits Case
The Ayodhya case in the Supreme Court was adjourned again today after the exit of one of the five judges in the constitution bench. Justice UU Lalit recused himself saying he had been a lawyer in a related case.
-
5 Judges To Rule On Polygamy, Why Only 3 For Ayodhya, Supreme Court Asked
A bench of five judges set up to decide if polygamy among Muslims is constitutionally valid was cited as a ground in the Supreme Court today to refer the Ayodhya land dispute to a larger bench. "Is the polygamy case more important than Ayodhya case? When polygamy can be referred to a Constitution bench, why not Ayodhya land dispute?" senior lawyer ...
-
Free Choice Or State Decision: Kapil Sibal Sharpens Argument On Aadhaar In Supreme Court
The legal challenge to the Aadhaar identification programme is the most important case ever heard by the Supreme Court, more important than the 1976 verdict in which the top court upheld suspension of fundamental rights during Emergency, senior lawyer Kapil Sibal told five judges of the Supreme Court today.
