Advertisement

Sonam Wangchuk On Why He Ended Fast Without Dharmendra Pradhan's Resignation

Sonam Wangchuk had been on a hunger strike in solidarity with the CJP members, who were demanding the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.

Sonam Wangchuk ended his hunger strike shortly after midnight on Thursday
  • Sonam Wangchuk said he broke his fast without Pradhan's resignation to protect protesters from legal action
  • "My focus was that students should not suffer. My main concern was legal action and FIRs," he said
  • He said that Pradhan, who is facing protests over examination-related irregularities, would quit eventually
New Delhi:

Activist Sonam Wangchuk has said that he decided to end his 26-day hunger strike without the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan because his priority was to prevent any legal actions against protesters who took part in the Cockroach Janta Party's (CJP) 'Sansad Chalo' march over alleged examination-related irregularities on Monday.

Wangchuk, 59, broke his fast shortly after midnight on Thursday after the Centre gave a written assurance that it wouldn't register cases against protesters, would hold a detailed discussion in Parliament on examination reforms and paper leaks, and was considering compensation for families of students who died by suicide following the NEET paper leak.

He had been on an indefinite fast since June 28 in solidarity with the members of the satirical political group, the CJP, who have converged at the Jantar Mantar in Delhi, demanding accountability over alleged irregularities in competitive examinations, reforms in the education system and the resignation of Dharmendra Pradhan.

New Delhi, Jul 17 (ANI): Environmentalist Sonam Wangchuk on the 20th day of his indefinite hunger strike as part of the Cockroach Janata Partys (CJP) protest, demanding the Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhans resignation over alleged examination irregularities and NEET paper leak, at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi on Friday. (ANI Photo/Amit)

Sonam Wangchuk during his hunger strike at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi on July 17
Photo Credit: ANI

Wangchuk, however, was criticised for ending the strike without Pradhan's resignation.

In a YouTube video posted late Friday night, he said the resignation was "certainly a factor", but he did not demand it during negotiations with the Centre because his priority was to prevent any legal actions against protesters.

"I don't consider it essential for me to personally bring about this resignation," he explained in a 24-minute video recorded from his hospital bed.

Calling resignation a "trivial matter" for the Centre, he said they are "suffering immense damage" by refusing to do it.

"Their reputation is being tarnished nationwide, and people are angry and filled with hatred," Wangchuk said.

He said he had also spoken to the union ministers for Pradhan's resignation during negotiations.

"They wanted more time, saying they couldn't commit just yet," he said.

He expressed confidence that Pradhan would resign eventually.

"I knew that they (Centre) wouldn't be able to hold out for long this way and would submit the resignation sooner or later. I knew the resignation issue would resolve itself quickly since they were the ones suffering the consequences, so I didn't press too hard on that," he said.

ALSO READ | Action Within 3 Months, 10-Year Jail, Rs 10 Crore Fine: Centre's Plan Against Paper Leaks

"My focus was that students should not suffer. My main concern was legal action and FIRs. I did not think it was necessary for me personally to secure the minister's resignation," he said, adding that the ongoing movement would continue pressing that demand.

On 'Deal' Allegations

Sonam Wangchuk also dismissed allegations that he had reached a "deal" with the Centre, and emphasised that his primary goal was to ensure that students involved in the protests would not face violence or legal consequences.

"Last night around midnight, I was told the ministers had agreed to give the assurance in writing. I was in a hurry because the situation in Delhi was such; there was apprehension that a major crackdown could happen. I was watching reports and was reminded of September 24, 2025, when police and CRPF personnel mercilessly fired at the youth of Ladakh. I was afraid something similar could happen here. I felt that if I ended my fast and appealed for peace, perhaps the situation could be diffused," he said.

Responding to criticism over ending his fast in the presence of Union ministers JP Nadda and Jitendra Singh, he said that those questioning his decision were unaware of the circumstances he faced after being moved from the protest site.

"If I had to make a deal, would I have remained hungry for 26 days? Could I not have struck a deal sitting in an air-conditioned room instead of fasting in Delhi's heat?" he said.

He said Nadda and Singh met him at Medanta Hospital in Gurugram and agreed to positively consider compensation for families of students who died by suicide following the NEET paper leak and a discussion in Parliament on accountability in the examination system.

He said he insisted that he would not end his fast without a written assurance that no legal action would be taken against peaceful protesters.

"They initially agreed to compensation and discussion in Parliament but were not ready to assure that no cases would be filed against protesting students. They offered only a verbal assurance. I insisted on a written assurance and did not relent until they agreed," Wangchuk said.

He said that he had hoped to end his fast in the presence of MPs, members of the Cockroach Janta Party, and representatives from Ladakh but claimed many of them were not allowed to meet him before the ministers arrived late at night.

Sonam Wangchuk speaks to the media on the 2nd day of his hunger strike during a protest by Cockroach Janata Party (CJP), at Jantar Mantar, in New Delhi on Monday. Cockroach Janata Party founder Abhijeet Dipke and others also present. (ANI Photo/Naveen Sharma)

Sonam Wangchuk speaks to the media on the 2nd day of his hunger strike on June 29
Photo Credit: ANI

"The biggest sorrow in my heart is that my colleagues, the students and the MPs who had come to support me could not be present when I ended my fast," he said.

Show full article

Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world

Follow us:
Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com