» Story
 
  SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Govt turns down demands for 26/11 commission
Press Trust of India, Friday June 5, 2009, New Delhi

AFP image

Pakistan and terror was the focus in Parliament on Friday. Leader of Opposition L K Advani  said the nation deserves to know what went wrong during the 26/11 attack in Mumbai.

Advani said an assessment was important so that future such attacks could be avoided.

But Home Minister P Chidambaram ruled out such a commission, saying the Pradhan report on 26/11 had conducted a detailed investigation.

Describing the Mumbai attacks as an "invasion of India" launched from Pakistan, L K Advani demanded setting up of an inquiry commission at Central level to determine what went wrong and suggest steps to prevent recurrence of such terror strikes.

Speaking on the Motion of Thanks to President's address in the Lok Sabha, he also asked the government to share with the House the evidence given to Pakistan on 26/11, especially in the wake of release of Jamaat-ud-Dawa chief Hafiz Mohd Saeed apparently on the grounds of insufficient proof.

He also asked the government to expedite the trial of Ajmal Qasab, the only terrorist arrested during 26/11 attacks.

Advani, who was reconciliatory towards government in his tone during the one-hour speech, appreciated the emphasis given to security in the President's address. He said terrorism was "proxy war" launched by Pakistan on India after its defeat in three open wars.

Referring to 26/11, he said it was not an ordinary terror strike but an "invasion of India" and "a kind of war".

He disagreed with reported conclusions of Pradhan committee of Maharashtra government that the Mumbai attacks was a "failure" of the Centre only and there was no lapse on part of the state authorities.

"The Centre should set up a Commission of Inquiry to review the conclusions of Pradhan Committee. The country and Parliament should know what went wrong and where," he said.

Advani said setting of commission was not against anyone but to find the lapses particularly as Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and National Security Adviser M K Narayanan had earlier warned that the next terror attack could come via sea.

He said the central probe commission was essential as then Maharashtra Chief Minister Vilasrao Deshmukh and Deputy Chief Minister R R Patil had resigned after 26/11.

Home Minister P Chidambaram intercepted by saying that they had taken moral responsibility which had not happened during the NDA rule.

Responding to this, Advani sarcastically wondered who had taken such a step in the UPA government after "numerous" such attacks.

While demanding setting up of the inquiry commission, the BJP leader said the US had taken a similar step after the 9/11 attacks and probe panel had come out with recommendations to prevent recurrence.

Referring to the release of Mumbai attacks "mastermind" Hafiz Saeed by Lahore High Court earlier this week, Advani said he had been set free on "technical grounds of insufficient evidence".

He noted that Saeed had been arrested by Pakistan under intense international pressure after India's efforts to get his outfit JuD proscribed by UN Security Council, which had observed that he had links with Al-Qaida and Taliban.

"UN Security Council took action but Pakistan government allowed him to go scot-free. Pakistan government will say that it (release) was a court decision. Pakistan government will try to hide behind it," Advani said.

"I demand that the evidence, which the government has given to Pakistan on Mumbai attacks, should be shared with the House so that the nation knows on what basis Pakistan charged Saeed," he said.

Advani also suggested that government should put pressure on Pakistan on the issue.

On Mumbai attacks, the former Deputy Prime Minister said ISI must have been involved in it as it is well-known that the intelligence and Lashkar-e-Toiba have "strong ties".

Advani said Vinita Kamte, widow of Maharashtra police officer Ashok Kamte, had levelled certain allegations and cast aspersions over Pradhan Committee's observations and these need to be examined.

Later, Home Minister P Chidambaram told reporters that "I don't think there is a need for a Commission of Inquiry. We are not going to appoint it."

"I am amused by that demand. So far as the Mumbai attacks of 26/11 is concerned, we have all the facts. I have gone into all the records and we are quite clear on how it happened and I have shared it with the House," he said.

The Home Minister said to demand a Commission of Inquiry six months after the event was "surprising".

"Besides, I would like to ask, did the NDA government appoint a Commission of Inquiry after Kandahar? Did they appoint a Commission of Inquiry after Parliament was attacked? I don't think that these kind of statements are going to help the situation," he added. (With NDTV inputs)

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend     
Comments: Read | Post
Tags: 26/11, Advani, attack, Mumbai
Comments
Posted by Bablesan on Jun 06, 2009
The request of our opposition leader is a reasonable. Nothing is there to be surprised. The way our Home Minister responded is pesimism. The is no point in showing what we did in past. Its a right of every citizen to know what went wrong to happen such a planned attack. So that we can plan what action we can take and what action have taken till now. So that we can close the loop hole to avoid such attacks in future.
Posted by Anil Kohli on Jun 05, 2009
Dear Mr. Home Minister, In the larger interest of the Aam Adami, who is the centre piece of your raison de etre, transparency being the second pillar, on which this government wants to build. Thirdly in the interest of the a healthy participative democracy. The need of the hour is a commission to probe 26/11. This was first of its kind, this has raised many questions in the minds of the people, incase you are genuinely interested in protecting the common man and the brave men in Uniform. Do you wish to avoid further large number of widows/orphans of men in Uniform and the common man in general. Then you should constitute the commission of inquiry without any further delay. There is nothing that we finding amusing, may be your sense of humor is better than ours. Why do you want to play politics? Why take a partisan approach when it can be avoided? You are fully aware Kandahar involved more than 1 country and no commission of inquiry was possible in that case, we would not have been able to get Nepal and Taliban controlled Afghanistan to agree to a commission of inquiry holding it sittings in those countries. As regards the Parliament attack, the weakness was that of the opposition, if it did not insist on a commission of inquiry. This cannot and should not be quoted as precedents to avoid an in depth probe into 26/11. Please do not compromise the safety and security of the nation and its people at the alter of competitive politics. Do not sow the seed of confrontation so early in the 15th Lok Sabha.
Advertisement
Advertisement
On Facebook

Blogs

The lazy afternoon is now full of action, not in the newsroom but in the kitchen of the bureau. Mr Thackeray, we invite you for lunch.
Within Bihar, Nitish faces a rising tide of opposition that now engulfs his own political party, the Janata Dal United.
More »