»  Arms and the Men  »   Post
Double standards of the West
Monday June 1, 2009 , New Delhi, India

If ever there was a proof needed about the double standards applied by the Western nations in dealing with Asia and Africa, there is no better example than their reaction to the developments in Sri Lanka over the last fortnight.

Here's a nation that secured a hard-earned military victory over what was unarguably the world's most dreaded and ruthless terrorist group--the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam or LTTE. Banned in 26 countries across the globe, the Tamil Tigers, as the LTTE was also known, had a powerful naval arm, a rudimentary air wing and at least 25,000 infantry fighters backed like a conventional army with 155 mm artillery guns, multi-barrel rocket launchers, Universal machine guns and claymore mines among other small arms.

This was the outfit that gave the world the suicide vest and suicide belt that were responsible for the assassination of at least one President and a former Prime Minister across two nations, this was the group that killed and wounded at least 70,000 people over a quarter century; here was a group who's writ ran large over one-third of a sovereign nation. And to top it all, the LTTE had kept over 250,000 innocent, hapless Tamil civilians--women, children, the young and the old--hostage for over two years and mercilessly used them as an insurance against the advancing Sri Lankan army.

If ever there was a ripe case for a well-planned and executed military operation, here it was in Sri Lanka. President Mahinda Rajapakse and his team went about prosecuting what, by all accounts, was a legitimate war. But the world, the Western world went into an overdrive to stop Colombo. Norway, Sweden, UK and to a lesser extent the United States put pressure on Sri Lanka by various means. Some threatened to move a resolution in the UN, others lobbied to prevent a bailout package mooted by the International Monetary Fund for the war-ravaged country. Now, many have called for war crime investigations into the conduct of the Sri Lankan military.

Had it not been for countries like Russia, China and to an extent India, Sri Lanka would have suffered grievously at the hands of the so-called liberal lobby, ably aided and abetted by the 'bleeding-heart' liberals among the western media who think they are the judge, jury and executors when it comes to dealing with Asian and African nations. All of them had tried to stop the war in Sri Lanka, ostensibly to safeguard the civilians but in reality the efforts were directed at rescuing LTTE chief Vellupillai Prabhakaran and his top associates.

The simple and bitter truth is: the Western world has not been able to digest the fact that a small, underdeveloped nation like Sri Lanka has managed to defeat a terrorist group, a feat that they have not managed despite deploying huge resources and manpower across the globe.

For years, the US and the NATO countries have been trying to vanquish the Al Qaeda and the Taliban, without much success. In the past decade, the US and other western militaries, operating in Iraq and Afghanistan to take just two recent examples, have killed and maimed scores of civilians. But except for cursory apologies, none of these nations or the defenders of human rights operating from the safe havens of western capitals have bothered to even acknowledge their gross mistakes.

So why is it that a small nation's victory over terrorism "fit to be tried for war crimes," but a big bully's (like the US) blatant violation of human rights is part of a "necessary war on terrorism?" Why didn't any one of these defenders of human rights put pressure on the LTTE when it was taking hundreds of thousands of civilians along with it as it retreated during the war?

If ever there is a clear case of the western nations' hypocrisy, it is demonstrable here in India's backyard, in Sri Lanka. Let Washington and London and Bonn and Ottawa first look at their own conduct before trying to prosecute a small country for doing what any sovereign nation has a right to do.

(The author, NDTV's Defence Editor, reported the war in Sri Lanka from the conflict zone for the past six months)

 
   SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Comments: Read | Post
Tags: LTE , Sri Lanka , West

Comments Post your comments
Showing 1-20 of 142
 
Posted by Aravazhi M P on Jun 22, 2009
The author as got an insight knowledge into the affair. It is a victory to the army and the government. But Humanity is completely lost. The west is talking about the lost Humanity. Why does the author not able to consider the loss of humanity in this war against terrorism? Any war against terrorism is to be appreciated. We supported the KARGIL war which completely eradicated the terrorists who intruded into the Indian border. But there is no casualty of civilians. We did not use Phosphorous Bombs or Cluster Bombs. As you can see, there is a militant clearance act going on in SWAT Valley of Pakistan. Government of Pakistan is allowing it's citizens to leave the SWAT and take refuge in others parts of the same country. It did not use Phosphorous Bombs, Cluster Bombs against its citizens. These are few of the very fine wars against terrorism. Whereas the Government of Sri Lanka headed by Rajabakshe, did not wage just the war against terrorism. But waged a total war against Jaffna Tamils in the nation of Sri Lanka. This war is more of "GENOCIDAL AGAINST JAFFNA TAMILS" than of a "WAR AGAINST TERRORISM". Rajabakshe must learn how to counter terrorism from India and Pakistan.
 
Posted by Amal Khaneja on Jun 18, 2009
I do not agree wholly, while i respect the point of view I do not see a major tactical victory against terrorism. This battle was more on the lines of conventional ground warfare. 1. The LTTE was not defeated in guerilla warfare / anti terrorism operations which is the situation the west is facing. 2. LTTE was defeated as it sought to fight conventional war more and more over the years. 3. Take the eg of any country which is facing terrorists. The ability of a terrorist to merge with the local population is a resounding advantage which makes differentation a tough task. 4. The very root of terrorism seems to stem from two major factors : social repression and political manifestation. Could the world learn from how terrorism was eliminated in punjab ?
 
 
Posted by Indian59yrs on Jun 15, 2009
This article is not only excelent but should be eye-opener for India.The Naxal movement is older than LTTE and so many Govts of all parties have failed to eradicate same. It is said that India has second largest Army in the world and not to speak of paramilitary forces with Central & state govts. But nobody is interested in eliminating the Naxals and "bleeding heart" liberals are seen all over the news channels & media advocating the cause of Naxalbari. There is so much loss of general public & govt properties, not t speak of lives of police and janta, yet all govts are still trying to solve problem with political -social solution which couldnt be done last 60yrs and will not be done next 100yrs!! No rebellion can stand the might of army as seen in SL & Pakistan. So first remove these thorns in development of India then only do the necessary politico-social solution. Now narly 1/3rd of India is affected and it will go to affect 2/3rd hen only the govts will wake up too late.
 
Posted by Karthick on Jun 12, 2009
I think why developed countries are not recognizing this as a victory because of the amount of causalities. Developed nations with its military strength can win any terrorist org if civilian causalities is taken away from the table.
 
Posted by SUDHADASAN on Jun 11, 2009
UN-DIGESTABLE-NAKED-GENUINE-TRUTH! Dear Mr.Nitin Gokhale! "The simple and bitter truth is": I wish to point out one & the only UN-DIGESTABLE-NAKED-GENUINE-TRUTH- about the double standard of the western countries over the hard earned victory of Sri Lanka! It is neither jealous nor inability to destroy the terrorism in their soils. Sri Lanka was too once ruled by the British like India. After getting freedom, Sri Lanka did an unbearable blunder(to the west, ofcourse), by switching over to Buddhism & that has burnt their bellies, fully jet black! And that's it! Now, just for argument sake, I am throwing a bomb like question to you! What will be the reaction of the West, if India announces that 'it is a NON SECULAR STATE FROM THIS MOMENT?' What is YOUR answer? My answer is:- All the West will keep yelling troubling us in the same way as they do against Sri Lanka now & keep pushing us TOO towards the Muslim countries or China as an ALTERNATIVE to the West! That's all! Hence, in anticipation, we should start learning Urdu & Mandarin both compulsorily from the school onwards! Hey! I think I have revealed an important 'One line' of a- 'Hollywood to Bollywood to Koliwood- cine story here, in the midst our 'Loose Talk' yaar!
 
Posted by Om Prakash Narayan on Jun 09, 2009
I only hope that the hapless citizens who were caught in the cross fire between the Sri Lankan Army and the LTTE, are able to come back to normal life as early as possible. It is an enormous challenge - one that cannot be easily done.
 
Posted by varun on Jun 07, 2009
Your so called defence expert is deprived of srilanka's history and this article overshadowed Tamil's cause.I have few questions for him, Why no independent agencies are not allowed inside the internment camps? Why tamils are not allowed air their voices? Why journalists critical of governtment's policies are not spared? why govt killed four TNA parmentarians? And above all sinhalese celebrations brings an impression that they have captured land from neighbour!!it seems that have forgotten the fact that it is their land.
 
Posted by R.Alamsha Karnan on Jun 06, 2009
Double standards has got so deeply embedded in our culture that we don't even realise that it's DS any more. Can we practice, what we preach?.
 
Posted by VPJ on Jun 06, 2009
Hi Nitin, I agree with you on this article from a point of view of military victory. Yes, it is a victory and will certainly make SriLanka a much safer place for everybody. On the other hand, I am unable to agree with you on the position of West. A military victory killing 20000 civilians in the last few weeks alone is not a victory by any standards. There is no justification for killing of innocent civilians. A military operation that could save these 20,000 civilians, yet defeat LTTE would have been a victory clearly. Secondly, I am not sure if we Indians can blame the West. We are part of the problem. For years, India had given assistance to LTTE. Just as US and allies created Taliban, we have played a part in creating LTTE. Suddenly it went out of control and turned against us just as the case with Taliban (as with all such organisations). Yet, we were not part of the solution. India kept quiet and distant, may be because we burnt our hands with IPKF (equivalent to military disaster of US in Vietnam, but on a smaller scale). So if you are speaking about (blaming)West and others, you also need to speak about India too. I would consider that a good journalism, not cover up one side because it was India. And no doubt, we have just witnessed a major milestone in peace in the Indian Ocean, sadly lot of people shed their blood for it. Well, certainly military won, humanity lost.
 
Posted by SM09 on Jun 05, 2009
Thank you Nitin, for an unbiased article on Sri Lanka's war on terrorism. As for why the western powers (Notably UK and US through Norway and other EU countries) tried to derail the Sri Lankan military operation and save/rescue the command and control figures of LTTE, perhaps Nitin can do digging-up into the plans by both US (and UK) to destabilize both India and Sri Lanka in the event that Sri Lanka becomes too cozy with China, and India with Russia? If they had Prabhakaran et al., safely in their hands, the west can, at will, stirr up sessionist trouble not only in Sri Lanka, but also in Tamil Nadu. As US has plans for NATO to expand into the Indian Ocean, a stronger Sri Lanka with ties to both China and India (and now with a large harbor being built in southern Sri Lanka by China) spells trouble for their future plans. Equally troubling for them is the fact that India has also become stronger both economically and militarily, and her policies are moving back towards having stronger relationships with Russia and other Asian bloc countries. But, with LTTE supremo and his commanders on hand they can unleash sessionist efforts in both south India and north Sri Lanka to undermine both respective democratic governments, as well as slow down or even reverse their economies, with the overall goal of exapnding the NATO's influence over the Indian ocean region, in order to dent the growing influence of both China and India in the region.
 
Posted by Rajesh on Jun 04, 2009
Why No mentioning of the killing of civilians. I agree at some points but not like killing of civilians to win a war. That SL indeed has to learn ( NOT from western countries) from its consciousness.
 
Posted by jack on Jun 04, 2009
Very good article. In many comments, people mentioned about the lack of knowledge of Nitin,Please note that Nitin and his team were very close to real war scene and I think they did wonderful job through NDTV with their inputs. Great work nitin.
 
Posted by greenchilies on Jun 03, 2009
It seems the Tamils fought a wrong war to begin with. As for the language issue, what is wrong with a country to select the majority language as the national language? If that is wrong, every country in the world is also wrong. As for Jaffna not being developled like Colombo, there Mumbai, Chennai and Bangalore, and there are little known and obscure places like Watrap and Kumily. You cannot expect the same kind of development to take place uniformly every where. Additionaly, Jaffna was important to the British during their time to keep tab on India. After independence, Sri Lanka had no such interest. As for the so called education based discrimination, it ended a year after it was enacted, yet the Tamils didnt want to acknoledge it, per an ex LTTE founding memeber Ragavan, who later chose the non violent path .Most of the discrimination of the low caste Tamils came from the high caste Tamils, and all LTTE did was to hijack their cause. The western powers ignited and poured fuel to the conflict by supporting the Tamil just to divide a country as has been done with Korea, Vietnam, etc in order to hedge their interests. Now that China and India are rising as world powers, the west is crying foul, and doing their best to accuse Sri Lanka and to pull it down to where they want it to be. Thousands of lives of Tamils, Sinhalese, and Moslems, were nothing but collateral damage to these blood thirsty animals. Tamils, Sinhalese and Moslems all should unite to stand as one people of one country. There is no other escape.
 
Posted by Envy on Jun 03, 2009
. Though there is no denying that the LTTE was termed as a terrorist organization, the roots of the conflict emerged from a terrorist state - Srilanka. The American (West) fight against terror is a totally different beast and cannot/should not be compared to the LTTE struggle. In the end the author seems to forget the civilian casualities caused by the Srilankan offensive and the high number of IDPs that Srilanka has to deal with. The conditions of the captured terrorists (or POW as the tamils would like to call them) is a big question mark and is suspected to be several times worse than any treatment meted at places like Guantanamo. The complete disregard for civilians is appalling.
 
Posted by BHAGYANATH MENON on Jun 03, 2009
that is indeed the culture - now the US President, w2ho is on a tour of the M.E, wants all the Muslim countries to follow the US - God knows for what. West has these Uncle Sam attitude - be it the westerners or the NRis who have also imbibed these attitudes over a period of time
 
Posted by John on Jun 03, 2009
What many seems to forget is the fact that Rajepakshe's Army was well aided and encourged by Communist China and theocratic Pakistan in its so called fight against LTTE and Tamils. India was kept with its hands tied in the back. India is now surrounded by its enemies, including in Lanka, which is just 80 miles off the Lankan coast.
 
Posted by Soupa on Jun 03, 2009
Which is double standard just showing we are in Gandhiji way (Ahimsaa)but helping to kill innocent civilians in Srilanks like Hitler way.
 
Posted by sam on Jun 03, 2009
A well written article. the truth
 
Posted by najeeb on Jun 03, 2009
During the thirty-year conflict many people of all ethnicities left Sri Lanka to seek greener pastures in Western countries. There are approximately 300,000 of them in Canada, 200,000 in the US, and another 300,000 in European countries. Many of these immigrants used the "political asylum" card, and as we have later discovered, many of those were lying about the persecution they claimed they received at home. I'm not singling out only the Tamils in this respect; Sinhalese and Muslim immigrants also played the same hand. Now that the LTTE has been crushed there should be fewer light aircraft, submarines, tanks, and other weapons smuggled from other countries. I know it may only make a dent in the huge international illicit weapons trade, but every little bit counts. Still, don't give up on "following the money trail," and do your best to expose those who supplied the LTTE with weapons until they are prosecuted in every country. With regards to prosecuting Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa, Army Commander General Sarath Fonseka etc for genocide in the international courts, I think the "Western Powers" should give up this ridiculous pursuit. I suggest that the UN and the "Western Powers" start concentrating on how they can help the IDP's in the North - seriously and quickly - and accept the fact that the authorities in Sri Lanka simply did what they had to do to rid their country of a terrorist scourge (the same that they would have done on their own turfs.) I think it's time the media in Western countries takes an honest, serious look at the great progress Sri Lanka has made on a number of fronts - in spite of dealing with a 30-year war against terrorism: the elections and massive re-development programs in the Eastern Province, the appointment of a former child soldier for the LTTE as Chief Minister for the Eastern Province, the Government's excellent health care and educational systems, the rehabilitation and appointment of former LTTE chief "Karuna Amman" as Vice President of the largest political party in the country, the rapid rebuilding of tsunami areas, and many others. While they're at it, the Western journalists can show the world how beautiful Sri Lanka is, and what a great place it is for tourists. Lastly, the "Western Powers" should be very careful about pushing Sri Lanka too closely into the arms of China, Russia, Pakistan, India, and other neighbors in the Asian region. A close relationship with China, for example, developed during the war against the LTTE when the GOSL couldn't get arms anywhere else. Now China is building a seaport in Sri Lanka's south, and is financially helping the Government care for the IDP's in the north. The "Western Powers" should be thinking about the balance of power in the region, and figuring out ways it can mend some fences with the GOSL - fast. The "Western Powers" don't seem to understand that every country has to have friends and allies in order to survive, and if they are abandoned by the West, then they have no choice but join the camps of China, Libya, and its Asian neighbors who are perhaps more friendly and sympathetic to their needs and goals. The policies and neo-colonial interests of the "Western Powers" need to be examined closely by all parties from this point forward. Everyone should learn to respect Sri Lanka as a democratic, free, sovereign nation that deserves a decent place in the international community. Give Sri Lanka a break. Stop wasting time trying to make an enemy, and concentrate on making a good friend instead.
 
Posted by Tamilselvan, USA on Jun 03, 2009
The author of this article sounds like not having enough knowledge about the past history of tamilians in SriLanka. I'm not a great supporter of LTTE. But strongly condemn against SL government. SL army killed so many innocent people for the past few months. Are you supporting this innocent killings? Tamils denied to get basic rights in SL. That you know that? Hopefully hereafter the peacefulness and equal rights given to tamils in SL. Please do not write this kind of article in the future without having good knowledge on the matter.
 
 
Post Your Comments Fields marked with * are mandatory
*Name:
E-mail:
*Comments:
  Limit 4000 characters - 4000 characters remaining
*Secure Code:
  Problem viewing this image. Click to refresh
 
 
Kindly do not post any defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful material or information. NDTV Convergence Ltd reserves the right to remove without notice any content received from users.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
On Facebook
About Me
A student of conflicts, insurgencies and wars, Nitin Gokhale has spent 26 years reporting on military and militants from various hostile fields like India's north-east, Kashmir valley, the Kargil war, China and Sri Lanka, among others. He's currently NDTV's Defence and Strategic Affairs Editor.
Latest Posts
The David Headley puzzle
I'm pretty convinced that there's something about the David Headley story that's hiding more than it's revealing.
Assam: Half a step forward
Rajkhowa's arrest is only half a step forward in efforts to resolve the three-decade old insurgency in Assam.
Jharkhand: The Tribal Paradox
Courtesy Madhu Koda, political parties are feeling emboldened to drop the holy cow, with politicians asking for a non tribal chief minister.