The Supreme Court today told the Delhi Police not to take coercive action against a journalist who alleged she was sexually assaulted by a police officer during the recent protest in Delhi's Jantar Mantar over the SIR issue.
A bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and comprising Justice Joymalya Bagchi said the allegations made by the journalist against the police officer were serious, and the court is checking whether an independent investigation is needed in the first place.
-
NDTV World Summit 2026: What To Watch Out For | PM Modi, Jaishankar, AI And Global Power Shifts -
Andrew Ng On AI At Scale: Building The Intelligence Economy | NDTV World Summit 2026 -
NDTV World Summit 2026: Behind The Scenes As Ayush And Vedika Preview Two-Day Mega Event -
Who Is Rajiv Mehta? Lilavati Hospital Trustee To Speak At NDTV World Summit 2026 -
Ex-CIA Director To Decode 'War In Times Of AI' At NDTV World Summit -
From Call Centre To Billion-Dollar Disruptor: Nikhil Kamath At NDTV World Summit -
Alain Ebobisse, Africa50 CEO, To Attend NDTV World Summit 2026. All About Him -
Kriti Sanon At NDTV World Summit: A Look At Her Career And Business Ventures -
Ex-CIA Director To Decode 'War In Times Of AI' At NDTV World Summit -
Who Is Vikram Rai, CEO, South Asia GE Aerospace, Set To Attend The NDTV World Summit 2026
The government's lawyer Tushar Mehta replied that they will look into the matter and place their findings before the Supreme Court. He said the journalist should cooperate with the probe and she would not be arrested.
After the protest seeking the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar in Delhi, the journalist had filed a sexual assault complaint against the Assistant Commissioner of Police Vivek Bhagat. The Delhi Police Crime Branch is handling the case.
Days later, the police also filed a first information report (FIR) against the 'independent' journalist and others on a complaint filed by Bhagat, who alleged he was subjected to casteist remarks, public humiliation and defamation during the protest.
Mehta, appearing for the police, told the Supreme Court that many people call themselves freelance journalists just by carrying a mic but only make reels for social media.
"We don't know who is a reel-maker and who's a journalist," the government lawyer said.
The Supreme Court took note of the matter and ordered the police to complete the investigation into the journalist's allegations in a timebound manner. After that, the Supreme Court observed some journalists were accredited while some were associated with organisations.
"I think we all agree that the issue needs consideration. And certain categories who may require an extra layer of protection," the Supreme Court said. "We may need to examine if everyone would start claiming to be a journalist then what would happen," it said.
Earlier today, the Delhi High Court declined an urgent hearing to the journalist who sought protection from coercive action in the case filed by the Delhi Police officer over allegations of making casteist remarks and subjecting him to public humiliation.
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world