New Delhi:
Shoma Chaudhary, the Managing Editor of Tehelka, spoke to NDTV today about the charges of sexual assault against her boss Tarun Tejpal, who is the founder of the news-magazine.
Here are the highlights of her interview:
Can't comment on rape charges and FIR against Tarun Tejpal - have just heard of them
Will cooperate with investigation
Journalist who complained of sexual assault said she was not driven by a sense of vengeance after she received Tejpal's apology
I started getting barrage of calls with people asking me to go to police. I had no idea her account was in public domain
When Tarun Tejpal sent email that he's stepping down, how could there have been attempt at a cover-up?
To be charged with rape, doesn't mean rape... and two days ago he wasn't. Keep chronology straight
People from the outside can say why its wasn't better handled but one is operating in the real-time zone
In retrospect, the language of both his letter and mine seems tonally wrong in my understanding
His actions as individual separate from institution
I was trying to do right by my junior colleague. There were considerations about issues like financial closure.
Just before I released the letter to office, I spoke to her
Officially, I did not cross-check her version with the three other journalists she marked on the email
Why I didn't follow Vishakha rules is a contested question. My lawyers said it wasn't necessary
On a phone call with her, she said she was satisfied with the actions
I acknowledge the tonal error on my part
Huge misconception that I had known of the incident for days
Not my place to go to police
Still not willing to speak about Tarun Tejpal's version publicly because it is his right to go before the committee
Tarun Tejpal's letter of recusal not a letter of apology to the woman journalist
Tarun extended an unconditional apology to her in a letter that is not in the public domain
Don't unilaterally want to go to the police and I stand by that
It is her prerogative to go to the police
Aghast that a man of Arun Jaitley's stature and legal standing will say rape and not alleged rape since he has only one side of the story
Word 'rape' came in public domain because of the people outside Tehelka
If the girl's version turns out to be correct, I would see it as rape or attempt to rape at least
Was so devastated with her account, that for 2-3 days my sole aim was to address her sense of extreme grievance
Now it has entered a zone of criminality and legality, that wasn't the zone we were operating in two days ago
Tehelka's work, other journalists, the institution not a party to the transgression
She didn't accuse him of rape, she said sexual molestation
Within the institution did not want her character or accusations put up for discussion, that was in a limited sense my politics
The intention wasn't to put out anything. I didn't leak the letters out
The saddest thing for me is to be seen in opposition to her. Proud she spoke out
But in a criminal case, I have equal allegiance to both sides