Tech giants Microsoft and Google have moved the Delhi High Court against its single-judge bench's order directing search engines to proactively remove non-consensual intimate images (NCII) from the internet without requiring specific URLs.
The companies argue that implementing such directives is technologically unfeasible and exceeds the existing legal framework.
During proceedings before a division bench of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, Microsoft stated that complying with the single-judge's directions is not feasible due to technological limitations and that the directives go beyond established legal boundaries.
-
Is AI Bubble Waiting To Burst? Nikhil Kamath Warns Of Tougher Months Ahead -
"We Don't Have 5 Years": Celebrated American General Sounds Alarm On War -
"There Will Be Issues Between Big Countries": S Jaishankar On India-China -
Neha Goyal Makes Stunning Asian Games Gold Revelation At NDTV World Summit 2026 -
Big NDTV Summit Impact: RBI Governor's Tata Sons Listing Remark Makes Top Newspaper Headlines -
"Certainty Is A Problem": Nikhil Kamath On Marriage, Children And Future -
"High Inflation Is Like Tax On Everyone": RBI Governor At NDTV World Summit -
RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra's Big Hint On Tata Sons Listing Row At NDTV World Summit -
The Mystery Of A Bare Nail In Ashwini Vaishnaw's Office -
To PM Modi's "Failed Product" Jab At Rahul Gandhi, A Shashi Tharoor Counter
The appeals by Microsoft and Google challenge a judgment delivered by Justice Subramonium Prasad on April 26.
It was revealed that Google has also filed a similar appeal, which is scheduled for consideration on May 9.
The court has decided to review both cases simultaneously.
Justice Prasad had cautioned social media intermediaries that they risk losing their liability protection if they fail to adhere to the timeframe specified under the Information Technology Rules for removing non-consensual intimate content.
He had said that search engines possess the necessary technology to remove NCII content without requiring victims to repeatedly seek the court's intervention, and cannot claim helplessness in removing or disabling access to links containing illegal content.
Representing Microsoft, senior advocate Jayant Mehta argued that the single judge's reliance on Meta's tool for content removal is misplaced, as Bing, Microsoft's search engine, does not host any content. He contended that complying with the court's order to proactively search for and remove such content throughout the database is not feasible given current technology limitations.
Mr Mehta also pointed out the impracticality of deploying Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools to execute the directives, as AI would struggle to differentiate between consensual and non-consensual images.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world