- Taj dragged into political row after its exclusion from tourism booklet
- BJP lawmaker says Taj built by "traitors", is a "blot on Indian culture"
- "Individual view", says BJP, disowns Sangeet Som's comments
"Many people were worried that the Taj Mahal was removed from the list of historical places in the UP tourism booklet. What history are we talking about? The man who built Taj Mahal imprisoned his father. He wanted to massacre Hindus. If this is history, then it is very unfortunate and we will change this history, I guarantee you" Mr Som said at a rally in Meerut on Sunday.
His party senior Nalin Kohli disowned the comments and said: "That is his individual view. Taj Mahal is an important part of our history. It's part of incredible India. What happened in history cannot be erased but at least it can be well-written history."
Hours later, Mr Som issued a clarification. "I don't oppose Taj Mahal. It's a beautiful heritage. I oppose the Mughals who built it and how they've been portrayed in history," he said.
Mr Som is notorious for his inflammatory speeches and is among the politicians charged with instigating riots that left over 60 dead and tens of thousands displaced in Muzaffarnagar in 2013.
Despite the BJP denouncing his comments, there is also support within the party for him. "The Taj is a tourist spot...don't link it with Indian culture," said BJP parliamentarian Anshul Verma.
What did find a place among top attractions of UP was the temple of Gorakhnath at Gorakhpur, which is headed by Yogi Adityanath.
Jammu and Kashmir politician Omar Abdullah quipped in a tweet: "No more Red Fort speeches on 15th August? 'The PM will address the nation from Nehru Stadium' will fill some hearts with unabashed glee."