The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a PIL challenging the government's decision to cancel the UGC-NET examination following alleged question paper leak.
A bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, however, said the dismissal of the PIL does not amount to a decision on the merits of the PIL as it was filed by a lawyer and not by aggrieved students.
-
Neeru Dhanda Carried Homemade Churma To Asiad, Returned With Two Gold Medals -
Inside The Mind Of Archer Kumkum Mohod, Who Dared To Challenge South Korea -
"High Inflation Is Like Tax On Everyone": RBI Governor At NDTV World Summit -
AI Agents To Outnumber Humans Soon? What Futurist Mike Walsh Told NDTV -
This Delhi Boy Has 3 Michelin Stars. His Heart Still Goes To Rajindar Da Dhaba -
Ashwini Vaishnaw Explains Semiconductor Complexity: 'Everything On This Tiny Nail' -
Indian-Branded Mobile Phones By October 23, 2028, Says Ashwini Vaishnaw -
AI Law In India Soon? What Ashwini Vaishnaw Said At NDTV World Summit -
World's 1st AI Actor Tilly Norwood Was Asked If She Knew Hindi. A Conversation Followed -
Iran's Supreme Leader's Representative Says India Can Play 'Big Role' In Middle East Peace
"Why are you (lawyer) coming? Let the students come here themselves," the CJI told the lawyer, adding "while declining the above PIL, we express nothing on merits".
The bench asked advocate Ujjawal Gaur, who has filed the PIL as a petitioner, to focus on some legal matters and leave such issues for aggrieved persons.
The plea was filed against the decision of the Union education ministry and the National Testing Agency to cancel the UGC-NET exam following inputs that its integrity may have been compromised.
The ministry on June 19 had ordered the cancellation of the UGC-NET exam and handed over the matter to the CBI for an investigation.
In the plea, Mr Gaur also sought a direction to immediately stay the proposed re-examination of the UGC-NET exam until the CBI completes its inquiry into the paper leak allegations.
"The petitioner asserts that the decision is not only arbitrary but also unjust, given the recent findings of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
"The CBI's investigation brings the fact that the evidence suggesting the paper leak is doctored, thus nullifying the grounds on which the cancellation was based," the plea, filed through advocate Rohit Pandey, said.
The petitioner submitted that the "unwarranted" cancellation of the exam has caused significant distress, anxiety, and an unnecessary expenditure of resources for the aspirants who have rigorously prepared for this crucial examination.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world