The Supreme Court is scheduled to pronounce its order on October 13 on a batch of pleas seeking an independent investigation into the Karur stampede incident in which 41 people lost their lives.
A bench of Justices J K Maheshwari and N V Anjaria will pronounce the verdict on the pleas.
On Friday, the top court, while reserving its orders, had questioned the Madras High Court for constituting a special investigation team (SIT) to probe the stampede and wondered how it had proceeded with the matter.
READ: Supreme Court Questions Tamil Nadu, High Court Over Stampede At Vijay's Rally
"We are unable to understand how this order was passed? How did the single bench in the Chennai Bench proceed with the matter when the division bench in Madurai was considering the matter? "In my experience of over 15 years as a judge, a single bench holds back if the division bench has taken cognisance," Justice Maheshwari had observed.
Senior advocate Gopal Subramanium, appearing for Tamil actor Vijay's political party Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), had argued that the petition before the high court was filed only to frame a standard operating procedure (SOP) for political rallies.
He had submitted that the SIT was constituted by the high court on the first day itself, and the court made adverse remarks against the party and Vijay without hearing them.
Senior advocate C A Sundaram, also appearing for the TVK, had submitted that the chief justice of the high court can authorise a special bench to hear the matter, but it has not happened in this case.
Both lawyers told the top court that the high court's observations that the TVK and Vijay abandoned the place and that they did not express remorse were wrong.
They said the police forced the actor to leave the place on the grounds that it would aggravate the situation.
The Tamil Nadu government had argued that the SIT was formed by the high court itself and that the state did not give any names, and those included in the probe panel were the officers who are known for their integrity and independence, and there was no reason to doubt.
Earlier, the CJI-headed bench agreed to hear BJP leader Uma Anandan's plea challenging the high court order refusing a CBI probe into the September 27 stampede.
BJP leader from Tamil Nadu, G S Mani, has also filed a petition seeking a CBI probe into the stampede.
READ: Vijay's TVK Identifies Karur Venues For Meeting Stampede Victims' Families
The TVK has sought an independent investigation under the supervision of the Supreme Court, contending that a fair and impartial probe would not be possible if conducted solely by officers of the Tamil Nadu Police.
The plea has objected to the high court constituting an SIT only with officers of the Tamil Nadu Police. It alleged the possibility of a pre-planned conspiracy by some people that led to the stampede.
The plea also took exception to the scathing remarks of the high court against the party and the actor-politician, that they abandoned the place after the incident and did not express any remorse.
Earlier, the police said the rally saw a turnout of 27,000, nearly three times the expected 10,000 participants, and blamed a seven-hour delay by Vijay in reaching the venue for the tragedy.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world
