This Article is From May 25, 2022

Delhi Molestation-Murder Case Conviction Set Aside, 5 Get Benefit Of Doubt

In the case pertaining toa case of molestation and murder of a woman in Delhi's Uttam Nagar, the five convicts were earlier awarded life imprisonment by a trial court.

Delhi Molestation-Murder Case Conviction Set Aside, 5 Get Benefit Of Doubt

The Delhi High Court acquitted the five convicts in the molestation-murder case. (Representational)

New Delhi:

The Delhi High Court acquitted five molestation-murder convicts, giving them the benefit of doubt while terming the testimony of eyewitnesses as not truthful.

The appellant had been awarded life imprisonment by the trial court in 2019.

They had challenged the trial court order of conviction and sentence, pertaining to a case of molestation and murder of a woman in Delhi's Uttam Nagar area on the night of 28-29 March, 2014.

The Division Bench of Justice Siddharth Mridul and Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani allowed the five criminal appeals and set aside the judgement of conviction and order of sentence passed by the trial court.

The appeals were filed by Mantoo Sharma, Beerpal, Mohd. Naseem alias Samim, Naresh alias Anna and Jaipal. The High Court acquitted them and directed their release unless required in any other case.

The bench while acquitting five appellants observed, "On the touchstone of the cardinal principle of criminal jurisprudence that 'contradictions' in testimony are not acceptable, though 'discrepancies' may be, we are not persuaded to accept the testimony of eyewitness as being truthful."

"The eyewitness had confessed in the court that on the date of the incident he had consumed ganja. This yet again makes us doubt the credibility of the prosecution witness as an eyewitness," the bench observed in the judgement of May 24, 2022.

The bench also observed, "If two views are possible on the evidence adduced in a case, the view favouring the innocence of the accused should be adopted, in our opinion, in this case, there are clearly two views that are possible in light of the several material contradictions in the prosecution case. Such contradictions must ensure the benefits of the accused and we are therefore persuaded to accept the view favourable to the accused persons."

In the case, it was alleged that some of the appellants made the woman consume liquor, and subsequently molested her and then hit her on the head with a beer bottle and pieces of brick and stone, which led to her death. The appellants were arrested pursuant to the registration of an FIR. They were convicted of murder by Tees Hazari Court.

The Delhi High Court further observed, "No beer bottle nor any shards of glass were recovered from the crime scene; nor were any traces of alcohol found in the victim's body during post-mortem."

.