Advertisement

Breakthrough Blood Test May Diagnose Chronic Fatigue Syndrome With 96% Accuracy

If validated on larger, more diverse populations, this test could transform diagnosis, reducing delays, misdiagnosis, and stigma.

Breakthrough Blood Test May Diagnose Chronic Fatigue Syndrome With 96% Accuracy

For decades, patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) have faced a diagnostic dilemma. They have experienced or lived with debilitating fatigue, cognitive difficulties, post-exertional malaise, yet no definitive laboratory test existed to confirm their suffering. Diagnosis has often been one of exclusion, ruling out thyroid disease, anaemia, depression, and more, leaving many waiting years or being misdiagnosed. This diagnostic uncertainty has contributed to stigma, delayed care, and frustration among patients and clinicians alike. Now, a team of scientists at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in collaboration with Oxford BioDynamics claim to have leapfrogged that barrier.

They have developed a blood test based on genetic markers, specifically, patterns of DNA folding detectable in blood samples, that reportedly distinguishes chronic fatigue syndrome patients from healthy individuals with around 96% accuracy. The test, leveraging the EpiSwitch 3D genomics platform, is being touted as the first high-accuracy blood diagnostic tool for chronic fatigue syndrome.

If borne out by further trials, this would mark a paradigm shift in how the illness is understood, validated, and treated. Patients could receive diagnosis earlier, and the scientific and medical communities might finally gain a biomarker anchor around which therapies, trials, and acceptance can coalesce.

But as with all early-stage breakthroughs, the promise must be tempered by scrutiny. Rigorous independent validation, across different populations, severities, and co-morbid conditions, is essential. It's very important to remember that though the test is a hopeful step and a breakthrough, it's not yet a clinical standard.

Unpacking The Study's Methods

The researchers aimed to find a reliable blood-based assay or test to diagnose ME/CFS, a condition long lacking a validated biomarker, by detecting consistent epigenetic differences (how DNA is folded) between affected individuals and healthy controls. To do this, they used EpiSwitch 3D Genomics, a platform that examines the 3D conformation or folding of DNA in cells. Even if the underlying genetic code is unchanged, how DNA is folded (which regions are physically close, looped, etc.) can regulate gene activity (epigenetic control).

The study analysed blood samples from 47 patients with severe ME/CFS and 61 healthy control individuals. The team looked for distinct "folding patterns" or DNA-DNA interaction signatures that were consistently different in ME/CFS patients vs. controls. The test reportedly achieved around 96% overall diagnostic accuracy (though media reports vary slightly on the breakdown).

Promising Results, But A Long Way To Go

The researchers suggest this is a major advance, potentially paving the way for similar diagnostics in related conditions such as Long COVID. Media reports also describe that in prior work, the test showed around 92% sensitivity and 98% specificity in slightly different cohorts. The test moves ME/CFS diagnosis toward a measurable biological marker, rather than pure symptom-based exclusion.

If validated, 96% accuracy is impressive for a disease historically diagnosed by exclusion. Because epigenetic markers can change in response to environment or disease state, this method may capture disease processes rather than fixed genetic predisposition. The same EpiSwitch technology has been used in other disease biomarker contexts (e.g. cancer diagnostics).

The development of a high-accuracy blood test for ME/CFS is an exciting and potentially transformative advance. By leveraging epigenetic markers, the researchers have brought us a step closer to a biological signature for a condition long shrouded in diagnostic uncertainty. But we must temper optimism with caution. The study is preliminary, based on a modest sample, and lacks rigorous testing in patients with similar clinical presentations. Before this becomes part of standard medical care, it needs large-scale validation across diverse populations and in real-world clinical settings.

If those hurdles are surmounted, the test could shorten diagnostic odysseys, reduce stigma, and usher in a new era of precision medicine for chronic fatigue sufferers. Until then, this remains a promising clue in a complex puzzle, not the final piece.

Disclaimer: This content including advice provides generic information only. It is in no way a substitute for a qualified medical opinion. Always consult a specialist or your own doctor for more information. NDTV does not claim responsibility for this information.

Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com