This Article is From Feb 04, 2015

Delhi Polls Not A Referendum On Modi Government's Performance, Says Union Minister Venkaiah Naidu

Delhi Polls Not A Referendum On Modi Government's Performance, Says Union Minister Venkaiah Naidu

Union Minister Venkaiah Naidu has said the Delhi Assembly elections cannot be seen as a referendum on the performance of the Narendra Modi government.

New Delhi:

With most of the opinion polls giving an edge to AAP in Delhi elections, Union Minister M Venkaiah Naidu today said the electoral mandate in the national capital cannot be seen as a referendum on the performance of Narendra Modi government at the Centre.

"It is the election for the Chief Minister and not for the Prime Minister. Narendra Modi is not fighting Assembly elections. It is a state election. You are going to elect a Chief Minister, not a Prime Minister. It is the BJP versus the rest. That is all," Mr Naidu told PTI in an interview.

However, he defended his party's aggressive campaign to win Delhi polls, saying the mood of the country now was to strengthen the hands of the Prime Minister, who is trying to bring a transformation, and Delhi being the capital, naturally acquires importance.

Dismissing that Delhi polls were Modi versus Arvind Kejriwal, he said, "Who is Kejriwal. He fought Parliamentary elections. See, what happened. The same thing is going to happen to him here also. There is no comparison between Modi and Kejriwal. Modi is the Prime Minister of India, who has been elected by people and then backed by nearly 400 MPs."

To a specific question on whether the results in Delhi could be called some sort of a referendum on Modi government's performance at the Centre, the Minister, who has been president of the BJP twice, wondered, "How can it be? Then what about Maharashtra, Jharkhand, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir elections. Were they also referendum?"

On the decision to name former IPS officer Kiran Bedi as the party's Chief Ministerial candidate, he said it was a "considered decision taken unanimously" by the party leaders and rejected views that her nomination was a mistake.

Mr Naidu also alleged that both AAP and Congress had earlier "ruled and ruined" Delhi together and will join hands again.

Terming as "absurd" Congress general secretary Digvijay Singh's remarks that there could be BJP's hand behind AAP funding allegations, he said, "Congress and AAP have very good connections. They were together. They have ruled and ruined Delhi... That shows where does the Congress sympathy lie. They are trying to rescue AAP. It's an indication of things to come. People should see it. I say 'pyar kiya to darna kya'... Tell people that you are together," said Venkaiah Naidu.

Pointing out that it was not BJP which had levelled allegations against AAP but its own former members, Mr Naidu said, "We have not made these allegations. These allegations are to be seen in the backdrop of AAP claiming to be seen as a clean party, value-based party.

"They (AAP) said all other parties accept cash but they do not. They said they check it and have a high-level committee, which scrutinises all this. People have a right to know whether the high-level committee met, scrutinised the donations, approved it? Are they aware of the antecedents of these people? Who are they? What are their source? They are now trying to divert the issue."

On AAP's position that it was ready for a probe with the rider that it should also cover the funding of Congress and BJP, Mr Naidu claimed that they want to buy time, prolong it till the time poll is over. "Then enquiry or no enquiry will not matter. That is why they are trying to buy time. That is why they are talking about going to the Supreme Court on such an issue. These are diversionary tactics. AAP is caught, pants down. They have no answer," he said.

Asked why the BJP manifesto for Delhi is silent on the issue of statehood for Delhi, a demand which they raised many times, Mr Naidu did not give a direct answer, and said while this is being talked about for years, "there is no consensus in the political parties. That is why."
 

.