In the lawsuit, Uber India Systems Pvt Ltd claimed that its drivers were being "verbally abused, physically assaulted and threatened" and sought an injunction on restraining the defendants from stopping Uber drivers to work .
Uber India Systems Pvt Ltd's lawsuit names Sangharsh Tourist Chalak Malak Sangh, an association of taxi owners and drivers, Action Committee of Maharashtra against Ola and Uber, Mumbai Vikas Foundation, All Drivers Welfare Association and Maharashtra Tourist Permit Union.
"The defendants are deliberately, unlawfully and wrongfully resorting to violence and intimidation under the garb of strikes and protests in Mumbai and thereby restraining drivers associated with the plaintiff's mobile App from operating and pursuing livelihood," the suit said.
It further alleged that the defendants have been engaged in "actively inciting" drivers of Uber to go on strike and protest against the company.
"The defendants have been hampering the legitimate business of plaintiffs (Uber) by interfering in their operations quite extensively across the city of Mumbai. They have been indulging in threats to the driver partners of Uber, in the event they wilfully continue to drive using the Uber App," the suit alleged.
The suit referred to a protest held by the taxi owners and drivers associations at Azad Maidan in south Mumbai in March this year when several Uber cars were allegedly damaged and their customers and drivers were threatened with dire consequences.
The company has also claimed that a total of 830 incidents have been reported wherein either the driver or the passengers have been harassed.
"As the magnitude of such protests are only increasing, the plaintiffs anticipate further losses. Hence the company seeks the court to grant injunction restraining the defendants from stopping Uber drivers to work," the suit said.
"The plaintiffs further seek a direction to the defendants to pay a sum of Rs 12.41 crores as damages to business, reputation and goodwill of Uber," the suit said.
The suit is likely to be heard by Justice S J Kathawalla in due course.
Over the last few months, taxi unions and drivers association in several cities have gone on strike against the app-based cab aggregators for affecting their business.