The Delhi High Court has restrained the heads of nine JNU centres from taking any "major decisions" and said that their appointment by the varsity's Vice Chancellor was prima facie without any authority.
A bench headed by Justice Rajiv Shakdher stated that the Vice Chancellor is not vested with the power to appoint Chairpersons of Centres or Special Centres as the JNU statute confers the power of appointment on the Executive Council.
-
NDTV World Summit 2026: AI, Chips, Warfare And The Future Of The World | Key Conversations -
Kriti Sanon On Situationships, Open Relationships And Being Old-School -
'AI Scares Me': Kriti Sanon On Personality Rights And Need For Laws -
'This Time I Wanted Gold': Savita Punia Reflects On Historic Asiad Success -
Favourite Bollywood Actor To 5-Year Plan, Kriti Sanon Interviews AI Actor Tilly Norwood -
Neeru Dhanda Carried Homemade Churma To Asiad, Returned With Two Gold Medals -
Inside The Mind Of Archer Kumkum Mohod, Who Dared To Challenge South Korea -
India's Golden Girls: Asian Games Champions On Sacrifice, Success And LA 2028 -
RBI Governor Was Asked About Tata Sons' Listing. He Read The Rulebook -
"High Inflation Is Like Tax On Everyone": RBI Governor At NDTV World Summit
The bench, also comprising Justice Talwant Singh, was dealing with an appeal against a Single-Judge order which had refused to grant a stay on the appointments on a petition by Professor Atul Sood.
Observing that it was "cognizant of the fact that the Centres/Special Centres need Chairpersons for effective functioning", the court requested the Single Judge, who is hearing the challenge to the appointments, to advance the hearing on the writ petition.
"We are prima facie of the view that respondent no.2 (Vice Chancellor) is not vested with the power to appoint Chairpersons of Centres/Special Centres. The Statute confers the power of appointment on the Executive Council. Thus, clearly the appointment of Chairpersons of Centres/Special Centres by respondent no.2 is, as is evident at this stage, prima facie, without authority," the bench opined in its order dated October 26.
"Pending decision in the writ petition, the nine (9) Chairpersons, who have been appointed.. (as stated in) Minutes of the 296th meeting of the Executive Council, will not take any major decisions, including functions relating to convening of selection committees and/or carrying out selection(s), concerning the Centres/special centres," it added.
The court clarified that the views are only prima facie and the single judge will decide the writ petition on merits, after hearing both sides.
Lawyer Abhik Chimni, representing the appellant, said that the exercise of power of appointment in the present case by the Vice Chancellor was null and void in law and the Executive Council could not have approved the same subsequently.
JNU counsel Monika Arora stated that the power to appoint chairpersons to various centres is exercised by the Vice Chancellor from time to time, which is subsequently ratified by the Executive Council.
She informed that the single judge has indicated that he would examine the aspect as to whether the Vice-Chancellor could at all initiate the process of appointment of Chairpersons to various Centres/Special Centres, under the provisions of the JNU statute.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world