This Article is From Dec 20, 2022

"Attempt To End Judicial Independence Is...": Former Supreme Court Judge

Former Supreme Court judge Madan Lokur also questioned Law Minister Kiren Rijiju's recent statements critical of the judiciary, saying they are "completely unprovoked" and therefore "shocking"

New Delhi:

Efforts to infringe on the freedom of judiciary will not work, former Supreme Court judge Madan Lokur told NDTV today in the backdrop of the judiciary's escalating friction with the government on the subject of judicial appointments. He also questioned Law Minister Kiren Rijiju's recent statements critical of the judiciary, saying they are "completely unprovoked" and therefore "shocking".  

"There is no way the government can take away the independence of the judiciary through legislation or constitutional amendment," Justice Lokur said, when asked about former law minister Kapil Sibal's accusation that the government was trying to take away the "last citadel of freedom".   

"It (independence of the judiciary) is part of the basic structure of the constitution. Independence of judiciary is fundamental to democracy. So if there is any attempt to take away the Independence of judiciary by any means, it will be an assault on democracy," Justice Lokur said.   

In an interview with NDTV earlier today, Mr Sibal had said: "This (the judiciary) is the last citadel of freedom they have yet to capture. They captured all other institutions (pardon my saying) from the Election Commission to post of Governors to Vice Chancellors of universities to the ED (Enforcement Directorate) and the CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation), the NIA (National Investigation Agency) and of course the media."

Over the last weeks, there has been a stream of increasingly critical comments from the government on the judiciary and the judicial appointments process. Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has also joined in, demanding that the scrapped law on judicial appointments, which gave the government a bigger say in the process, be reintroduced.  

Mr Rijiju said that long vacations of the Supreme Court were inconvenient for litigants and the court should not hear "bail applications and frivolous PILs" at a time when the pendency of cases is so high. The issue of vacancies and appointments in the higher judiciary will continue till a new system is created, the minister had reiterated.

"Why should the Supreme Court not hear bail applications?" Justice Lokur questioned. "Does the law minister want everyone to be in jail? Why should public interest litigations not be taken up? Is he trying to say the Supreme Court should not act in public interest? I can't figure out what he is trying is trying to convey," he added. The minister's statement, he remarked, is "not good for judiciary, the government or the people of India.  

Regarding the delay in clearance of judicial appointments, Justice Lokur pointed out that the recent appointment of Justice Dipankar Datta was cleared by the government after two-and-half months.  Asked if this was deliberate, he said, "Looks like it. What else could be the reason?"