Women who accept their bodies, flaws and all, are more likely to eat healthily or intuitively. This suggests that women's typical reasons for dieting - dissatisfaction with their bodies - may backfire. There is a lot of negative body talk among women; women think that they can best lose weight and feel better if they are first dissatisfied with their bodies. Rather, the following results show that adopting a positive body image is more likely to be associated with intuitive eating. Intuitive eaters don't diet - they recognize and respond to internal hunger and fullness cues to regulate what and how much they eat. Intuitive eating has three components: unconditional permission to eat when hungry and whatever food is desired; eating for physical rather than emotional reasons; and reliance on internal hunger/fullness cues. In a previous research involving 199 college-aged women, the researchers found that women who followed intuitive eating principles had a slightly lower body weight than women who did not. Intuitive eating was negatively associated with body mass, such that people who ate intuitively weighed less than people who dieted. Researchers from the Ohio State University's Marion, USA, examined who were most likely to follow intuitive eating principles. They found, among nearly 600 college women, that those with higher levels of appreciation and acceptance for their body were more likely to be intuitive eaters. Intuitive eaters spend less time thinking about how their body appears to others and more time considering how their body feels and functions. They perceive the body as an agent of action rather than an object of attraction, focusing on how the body functions rather than its appearance. Intuitive eating is positively associated with psychological well being, such as self-esteem, positive emotions, adaptive coping, self-acceptance, optimism, and resilience in the face of stress. Intuitive eaters also reported receiving more positive messages from parents and others regarding their bodies.
American Psychological Association meeting,
August 2006