Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Event Organiser In Jantar Mantar Hate Speech Case

Preet Singh, who was sent to judicial custody on August 10 after his arrest, is accused of creating enmity between different groups and inciting the youth to propagate against a particular religion at a rally at Jantar Mantar here on August 8.

Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Event Organiser In Jantar Mantar Hate Speech Case

Jantar Mantar Hate Speech Case: Delhi High Court said custodial interrogation is not required

New Delhi:

Delhi High Court today granted bail to Preet Singh, an organiser of the Jantar Mantar event where communal slogans were allegedly raised last month, saying his custodial interrogation in the hate speech case is not required any longer.

Justice Mukta Gupta directed that the accused be released on bail on a personal bond of Rs 50,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

"The petitioner has been in custody since 9/10.08.2021.The petitioner is no more required for custodial interrogation. It is, therefore, directed that the petitioner be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs 50,000 with two surety bonds of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/ Duty Magistrate," the judge stated.

The release is subject to the accused not leaving the country without prior permission of the court and in case of change of residential address and/or mobile phone number, is to be intimated through an affidavit.

The court said that as per the record, the accused had left the venue at around 2:00 pm while "the main provocative words/ slogans were shouted by the co-accused at around 4:00 pm".

It added that at this stage, "it would not be appropriate" to express any opinion on whether the "words spoken by the petitioner make out an offence under Section 153A IPC (hate speech)" as it would be gone into at the stage of charge or during trial.

The order said: "The interview by the petitioner was not an isolated interview and was part of simultaneous conversation with number of speakers. Further large number of people gathered at the spot due to petitioner co-organizing the protest and therefore the petitioner would be liable for any offence committed in furtherance of the common object of the assembly. "However, as per the video footage and the call records of the petitioner, the petitioner left the spot at around 2:00 pm whereafter the main provocative words/ slogans were shouted by the co-accused at around 4:00 pm".

Preet Singh, who was remanded in judicial custody on August 10 after his arrest, is accused of creating enmity between different groups and inciting the youth to propagate against a particular religion at a rally at Jantar Mantar here on August 8.

Seeking bail, his lawyer Vishnu Shankar Jain, argued that a demand of a "Hindu Rashtra" did not amount to promoting enmity between religious groups.

Nothing is said by my client which attracts Section 153A IPC. They are putting a case of Section 34 IPC (common intention) but the event ended at 11:45 am and sloganeering happened at 3:45 pm. My client was not present at the time," he had stated.

Counsel Tarang Srivastava, representing the prosecution, opposed the grant of bail, saying that the investigation was still ongoing and Singh's absence at the time of chanting of allegedly communal slogans would not absolve him from any liability as all accused were acting in concert.

He added that even in his interview, Preet Singh referred to a specific community, which was "part of a series of same transaction."
 

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)