Metropolitan Magistrate Snigdha Sarvaria directed the AAP leader to personally appear before the court on the next date of hearing, considering that bail proceedings were pending.
"Considering that bail proceedings are pending, therefore accused (Kejriwal) is directed to appear in the court on next date of hearing for bail/miscellaneous proceedings... "Put up for bail/miscellaneous proceedings, appearance of the accused and arguments on framing of notice on December 24," the court said.
The court allowed exemption to Mr Kejriwal, noting the submission made by his counsel that the politician could not appear in the court due to "exigencies of work and some important meetings and discharge of his duties".
In the application seeking exemption for today, advocate Rishikesh Kumar also claimed that there was no absolute necessity for personal attendance of the accused and that the proceedings could go on unhampered in his absence, without any prejudice to the complainant Maulik Bharat Trust, an NGO.
Advocate Rahul Raj Malik, appearing for the complainant, opposed the application, saying "it was filed by Kejriwal to undermine the majesty of justice and the accused himself being the part of the legislative body, was trying to evade from law and the law for every person was the same".
It had noted that there was "sufficient ground" to proceed against him on allegations that he had concealed his correct address and suppressed the market value of his property in his affidavit to the Election Commission.
Earlier, the NGO had approached Delhi High Court with a plea seeking quashing of Mr Kejriwal's nomination papers on the ground of "illegalities" in his affidavit.
Delhi High Court had refused to entertain the plea and directed the petitioners to approach a magisterial court for remedy.