On Pegasus Scandal, Government Preps "Strong Defence": Sources

Pegasus spyware controversy: A response by MeitY said that in the past, similar claims were made regarding the use of the software by the Indian government

Pegasus spyware: The government said allegations on use of spyware are false claims

New Delhi:

The government will not back down from putting up a strong defence in the Pegasus spyware scandal, sources have told NDTV. The news website The Wire reported that phone numbers of Indian journalists were on the hacking list of an unidentified agency using the Pegasus software, made by the Israeli firm NSO Group. The centre has stuck to its earlier position that "no unauthorised interception" took place.

"We have nothing to fear and the government has nothing to hide. We will reply to any query. The news article proves nothing. In fact, previous attempts to link Pegasus with the government have failed," a source in the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) told NDTV.

NSO Group in its "Transparency and Responsibility Report 2021" says its products are "designed for the sole use of thoroughly vetted and approved governmental agencies charged with maintaining public safety and security." It says, "...We license Pegasus only to select approved, verified and authorised states and state agencies, specifically to be used in national security and major law enforcement-driven investigations."

A response by MeitY to a media questionnaire said that in the past, similar claims were made regarding the use of the software by the Indian government. "Those reports also had no factual basis and were categorically denied by all parties, including WhatsApp in the Supreme Court. This news report, thus, also appears to be a similar fishing expedition, based on conjectures and exaggerations to malign the Indian democracy and its institutions," the government said in the statement.

MeitY in the statement said India is a robust democracy committed to ensuring right to privacy as a fundamental right. "However, the questionnaire sent to the government indicates that the story being crafted is one that is not only bereft of facts but also founded in pre-conceived conclusions. It seems you are trying to play the role of an investigator, prosecutor as well as jury," the statement added.

The ministry also detailed the procedure through which "lawful interception of electronic communication is carried out in order for the purpose of national security, particularly on the occurrence of any public emergency or in the interest of public safety, by agencies at the Centre and States".

"The requests for these lawful interception of electronic communication are made as per relevant rules under the provisions of section 5(2) of Indian Telegraph Act ,1885 and section 69 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2000. Each case of interception, monitoring, and decryption is approved by the competent authority i.e. the Union Home Secretary," it said, adding that these powers are also available to the competent authority in the state governments. "There is an established oversight mechanism in the form of a review committee headed by the Union Cabinet Secretary," it said. 

In late 2019, WhatsApp filed a lawsuit in a US court, accusing Israeli surveillance firm NSO Group of helping government spies break into the phones of about 1,400 users across four continents.

Following reports that journalists and activists in India were also targeted, then Information Technology Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad told the Rajya Sabha that "no unauthorised interception" took place.