- Uttarakhand High Court is reviewing President's Rule for hill state
- Centre says once President gives his okay, judges cannot review decision
- Incorrect, say judges, latest in a series of rebukes for Centre
In successive hearings, the judges of the Uttarakhand High Court have suggested that the Centre's motives appear suspect in its decision to recommend that the state be governed by Delhi through the office of the Governor.
The Centre has been arguing that President's Rule cannot be reviewed by the courts. Unmoved by that contention, the judges today said, "There is no such decision like that of a king which cannot be subject to judicial review."
Late last month, the dissidence within the Congress against Harish Rawat as Chief Minister surged with nine legislators from the party voting against his budget. The Centre said that proved that Mr Rawat had lost his majority in the house. Without the rebel Congressmen, he was reduced to less than the 36 votes he needs to remain in power, the opposition BJP alleged. Based on the recommendation of Governor KK Paul, the Centre called for President's rule, and introduced it just a day before Mr Rawat was meant to take a trust vote as sanctioned by the High Court.
"You are cutting at the root of democracy," the High Court said earlier this week about the Centre, expressing its strong disagreement with the Centre's argument that it acted to prevent a constitutional breakdown in Uttarakhand.
"Each decision has an impact 10-20 years down the line," the judges said, referring to the precedent that could be set if President's Rule is unfairly invoked in states where the opposition is in power.
Follow NDTV for latest election news and live coverage of assembly elections 2019 in Maharashtra and Haryana.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram for latest news and live news updates.