The Allahabad High Court on Monday stayed criminal proceedings initiated by a local court in Gautam Buddh Nagar against Rashtriya Lok Dal chief Jayant Chaudhary for alleged violation of model code and COVID-19 norms during 2022 Uttar Pradesh assembly elections.
Hearing a plea by Mr Chaudhary, a Rajya Sabha MP, under Section 482 (inherent powers of high court), Justice Sanjay Kumar Singh also asked the state government's counsel to file reply within four weeks. The high court also gave two weeks' time to the applicant's counsel to file rejoinder affidavit thereafter.
-
Who Is Rajiv Mehta? Lilavati Hospital Trustee To Speak At NDTV World Summit 2026 -
Ex-CIA Director To Decode 'War In Times Of AI' At NDTV World Summit -
From Call Centre To Billion-Dollar Disruptor: Nikhil Kamath At NDTV World Summit -
'Every 5 Years, You'll See A New India': Swami Sarvapriyananda Ahead Of NDTV World Summit -
AI Can Think, But Can It Be Conscious? Swami Sarvapriyananda Weighs In -
Alain Ebobisse, Africa50 CEO, To Attend NDTV World Summit 2026. All About Him -
Kriti Sanon At NDTV World Summit: A Look At Her Career And Business Ventures -
Ex-CIA Director To Decode 'War In Times Of AI' At NDTV World Summit -
Who Is Vikram Rai, CEO, South Asia GE Aerospace, Set To Attend The NDTV World Summit 2026 -
Rahul Kanwal: The World Is Changing. What Comes Next? | NDTV World Summit 2026
The court directed to list this case for the next hearing after six weeks.
An FIR was registered against former UP chief minister Akhilesh Yadav, RLD chief Jayant Chaudhary and others at Dadri police station in Greater Noida in 2022 under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Epidemic Diseases Act, alleging that they violated model code of conduct and COVID-19 norms. Subsequently, a charge sheet was filed against them on October 12, 2022.
During the hearing, Mr Chaudhary's counsel Imran Ullah contended that the applicant was accompanying Akhilesh Yadav, against whom the entire criminal proceedings have already been stayed by a coordinate bench of this court.
Besides, his role is a limited one, as he was only present in the bus, which was carrying Akhilesh Yadav.
Ullah further contended that in such type of cases relating to violation of guidelines, the complaint can only be filed by the person whose order has been violated. In this case, it was not done and directly an FIR was lodged, he said.
He also contended that all witnesses in this case are policemen whose statements are same, hence cannot be relied on.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world