- Instant triple talaq barred till Parliament makes law: Supreme Court
- Five seniormost judges from five different faiths announced the verdict
- Absence of a woman judge on this crucial panel had drawn criticism
Triple talaq"is not integral to religious practice and violates constitutional morality", said the court.
The five judges, including Chief Justice JS Khehar, are from major faiths in India -- Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, Sikhism and Zoroastrianism.
Three of them, Justices Kurian Joseph, Justice Rohington Nariman and UU Lalit, said "what is sinful under religion cannot be valid under law."
They asserted that "triple talaq may be a permissible practice but it retrograde and unworthy. Since triple talaq is instant it is irrevocable and the marital tie gets broken, it violates the right to equality."
The constitution bench heard petitions filed by five Muslim women challenging the 1,400-year-old practice, including by one who was divorced on WhatsApp.
Justice Kurien Joseph said: "What is held bad in the Holy Quran cannot be good in Shariat and, in that sense, what is bad in theology is bad in law as well."
"There cannot be any Constitutional protection to such a practice," said Justice Joseph, disagreeing with the Chief Justice.
Muslims are governed by the personal law that came into force in 1937. The government has long argued that practices such as triple talaq violate fundamental rights of women.
The Muslim Personal Law Board had opposed any court intervention, arguing that the court must keep out of matters of faith.
The Centre told the Supreme Court that the practices like 'triple talaq' impact the social status and dignity of Muslim women and deny them fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
Justice Nariman and Justice Lalit said: "Divorce breaks the marital tie fundamental to family life in Islam. Not only does it disrupt the marital tie between man and woman, but it has severe psychological and other repercussions on the children from such marriage."