the insurance aspect of these jewellery shops. What are the unanswered questions after this heist? In this case, it has to be seen whether there was involvement of any insider or not. If there is involvement of any insider, then insurance companies may Raut the claim in this case, and further it depends on the policy of also what kind of policy the insured has taken in this case. And they are citing clauses in the, uh, insurance policies. If there is a forceful entry and, uh, there is a breakage of a door and in this case, wall has been broken. So, uh, if the policy has been adequate, then definitely he will going to get the claim in this case. But the main question is this. If there is an insider role, then insurance company may have the claim, but help us understand, Mr. You know this jewellery jeweller shop. The shop was established in 1948 so it's pretty old. It's about traditional jewellery, and perhaps it's it's going through generations. I want to understand from you when the highest of this nature happens and and whatever we have come to know so far, let's not forget that this is a commercial area. Uh, the showroom is located in a bustling area. My question then, is that if stores are so close to each other so cheek by job, then how will you How will the highest take place without a possible insider job? Definitely it It appears to be an insider job in this case because a person is aware where the locker is kept and huge amount was there. Huge amount of jewellery was here inside the locker. So the role of insider cannot be ruled out in this case. And so somebody must have definitely told the robbers where the jewelries are kept in in which locker.
