Hrithik-kangana

Farhan wrote a lengthy post about the Hrithik-Kangana controversy on Sunday

There were enough controversies through 2016 to keep us outraged, offended or just plain bewildered

We had reached a stage in our lives where I decided that it's better we weren't together. It was important to be aware and not be in a false relationship. We are close (friends)," said Sussanne Khan

"I clearly state that I support a person's constitutional right to fight back what She thinks is HER version of TRUTH," Raveena Tandon wrote on Twitter

"My client was scheduled to go for another meeting by 5 pm, however to accommodate the officer and her team, she rescheduled her other meetings and recorded her statements along with her sister between 5 pm up to about 8 pm"

"Pictures are photoshopped and untrue stories carry 2 much weight. another pic for d rec. I support @iHrithik in this," wrote Sussanne Khan

"It's shocking that people can go to these lengths to establish a lie. They are lying and using dangerous ways to camouflage that lie. They are making efforts to blur the line between what is true and what is concocted," said Hrithik Roshan's lawyer

A senior police officer from cyber police station said, "We are investigating the matter. Hrithik had given information about impostor conversing through the e-mail ID hroshan@email.com. We traced the IP address of the ID, and got location of a place in America

Why and how did a laptop become such an important piece of evidence in the Hrithik-Kangana controversy? Why is the actress not surrendering the said laptop to the cyber crime cell? Is the cell making matters more complicated?

Hrithik received a notice from Dr Abraham Mathai, All India President of the Indian Christian Voice, an organisation representing the larger interests of the Christian community, including Roman Catholics, in India. Dr Mathai demanded an apology from Hrithik for his comment on the Pope

A crime branch officer confirmed the development to mid-day and said that the actor himself visited the police station on Friday, March 25, along with his lawyer and lodged the complaint. The 42-year-old actor is the complainant in the case and not his legal representative, the source said

"A notice was sent by Hrithik's lawyer. It was regarding the application of mind because the notice of defamation was sent to Kangana without showing any such instances where the defamation was actually made out. There was no case made in the notice. So, it was absolutely baseless," said Rizwan Siddiquee

Farhan wrote a lengthy post about the Hrithik-Kangana controversy on Sunday

There were enough controversies through 2016 to keep us outraged, offended or just plain bewildered

We had reached a stage in our lives where I decided that it's better we weren't together. It was important to be aware and not be in a false relationship. We are close (friends)," said Sussanne Khan

"I clearly state that I support a person's constitutional right to fight back what She thinks is HER version of TRUTH," Raveena Tandon wrote on Twitter

"My client was scheduled to go for another meeting by 5 pm, however to accommodate the officer and her team, she rescheduled her other meetings and recorded her statements along with her sister between 5 pm up to about 8 pm"

"Pictures are photoshopped and untrue stories carry 2 much weight. another pic for d rec. I support @iHrithik in this," wrote Sussanne Khan

"It's shocking that people can go to these lengths to establish a lie. They are lying and using dangerous ways to camouflage that lie. They are making efforts to blur the line between what is true and what is concocted," said Hrithik Roshan's lawyer

A senior police officer from cyber police station said, "We are investigating the matter. Hrithik had given information about impostor conversing through the e-mail ID hroshan@email.com. We traced the IP address of the ID, and got location of a place in America

Why and how did a laptop become such an important piece of evidence in the Hrithik-Kangana controversy? Why is the actress not surrendering the said laptop to the cyber crime cell? Is the cell making matters more complicated?

Hrithik received a notice from Dr Abraham Mathai, All India President of the Indian Christian Voice, an organisation representing the larger interests of the Christian community, including Roman Catholics, in India. Dr Mathai demanded an apology from Hrithik for his comment on the Pope

A crime branch officer confirmed the development to mid-day and said that the actor himself visited the police station on Friday, March 25, along with his lawyer and lodged the complaint. The 42-year-old actor is the complainant in the case and not his legal representative, the source said

"A notice was sent by Hrithik's lawyer. It was regarding the application of mind because the notice of defamation was sent to Kangana without showing any such instances where the defamation was actually made out. There was no case made in the notice. So, it was absolutely baseless," said Rizwan Siddiquee