It is about time that lawyers be stopped from filing "bogus PILs (Public Interest Litigation)", stressed Supreme Court Justice DY Chandrachud today while chiding a practitioner for filing a "Publicity Interest Litigation" seeking compensation for families of those lawyers who died before the age of 60, whether by Covid or any other disease.
The court fined the lawyer Rs 10,000, which is to be paid to the Supreme Court Bar Association within a week.
-
Andrew Ng On AI At Scale: Building The Intelligence Economy | NDTV World Summit 2026 -
NDTV World Summit 2026: Behind The Scenes As Ayush And Vedika Preview Two-Day Mega Event -
Who Is Rajiv Mehta? Lilavati Hospital Trustee To Speak At NDTV World Summit 2026 -
Ex-CIA Director To Decode 'War In Times Of AI' At NDTV World Summit -
From Call Centre To Billion-Dollar Disruptor: Nikhil Kamath At NDTV World Summit -
'Every 5 Years, You'll See A New India': Swami Sarvapriyananda Ahead Of NDTV World Summit -
Alain Ebobisse, Africa50 CEO, To Attend NDTV World Summit 2026. All About Him -
Kriti Sanon At NDTV World Summit: A Look At Her Career And Business Ventures -
Ex-CIA Director To Decode 'War In Times Of AI' At NDTV World Summit -
Who Is Vikram Rai, CEO, South Asia GE Aerospace, Set To Attend The NDTV World Summit 2026
Lawyer and petitioner Pradeep Kumar Yadav had sought 50 lakhs for such lawyer families, arguing that the government has been providing financial aid to other communities in the society amid the pandemic.
Mr Yadav's plea commissioned considerable criticism from the top court judge, who, while throwing out the request, reminded the lawyer that his case can't be treated as an exception just because he is in a "black coat".
"Time has come that we have to stop the lawyers from filing these bogus PILs. This is a Publicity Interest Litigation and just because you are in a black coat, doesn't mean your life is more precious than other!" the top court said.
"It cannot happen that lawyers file such public interest litigations and demand for compensation from judges and that they will allow. You know there are a lot of people who died. You can't be an exception here, Mr Yadav," the Justice Chandrachud-led bench added.
Mr Yadav had argued that as all courts are not working, the very survival of the lawyers and their staff is severely affected. He further contended that faced with acute financial hardships and without any help, the lawyers are gravitating to other professions for survival.
The Delhi High Court and district courts in the national capital have resumed physical hearings in a restricted manner from late August.
On the other hand, the Supreme Court has switched to hybrid hearings - both physical and virtual - from September 1.
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world