- The verdict came two years after Shayara Bano approached the top court
- The Centre filed an affidavit against triple talaq based on her petition
- Petitions of four other women were tagged with Ms Bano's petition
The bench comprising Chief Justice JS Khehar, Justices Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Uday Umesh Lalit and Abdul Nazeer began hearing the petitions in May.
The judgement came two years after Shayara Bano from Uttarakhand first approached the top court after her husband of 15 years sent her a letter with talaq written thrice and left her. Petitions of four other women were tagged with Ms Bano's petition. The Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA) is the sixth petitioner in the case.
Let's take a look at the petitioners:
36-year-old Shayara Bano's husband gave her triple talaq in October 2015 and a year later, she approached the Supreme Court. Ms Bano's husband Rizwan Ahmed, a property dealer in Allahabad, also took away her two kids.
She asked the court to declare talaq-e-bidat (in which Muslim men utter 'talaq' thrice instantly -- sometimes via a written talaqnama, or even by phone or text message -- while not adhering to the three-month iddat period, which is meant for reconciliation and arbitration), polygamy and nikah halala (which involves the woman marrying someone else, consummating the marriage and then getting a divorce - after which she is able to remarry her first husband) illegal and unconstitutional.
Ms Bano's husband opposed her plea saying they were governed by the Muslim Personal Law and all three discriminatory practices are sanctioned by the law. She also alleged that her in-laws forced her to have six abortions and she had suffered much physical and mental stress.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government filed an affidavit against the triple talaq based on her petition.
Ishrat Jahan from Howrah, West Bengal, was divorced by her husband on the phone. In April 2015, Murtaza, her husband of 15 years, called from Dubai, said "talaq, talaq, talaq" and disconnected.
He had allegedly married another woman and took away their four children. Ms Jahan now wants her children back, and maintenance from Murtaza.
"I don't accept the talaq by phone. I want justice. I want my three daughters and one son back from my husband who snatched them away and I want maintenance for their upbringing. That's why I have gone to court. I will fight to the finish," she said.
Ms Parveen also alleges she was subjected to domestic violence over dowry.
"My husband felt like it one fine day and suddenly both my two-year-old son Ridan and I were homeless," said Ms Parween. She refused to accept it, following which her husband approached Rampur family court asking for dissolution of marriage based on the talaqnama.
Aafreen Rehman married in 2014 after meeting her husband through a matrimonial portal. "After two-three months my in-laws started mentally harassing me, demanding dowry," ANI news agency quoted her as saying. "Later they even started beating me and in September 2015 they asked me to leave their house."
She went back to her parents' home and received a letter via speed post announcing a divorce, she said. "This is completely wrong, unfair and unacceptable. I've filed a petition in Supreme Court seeking the court's intervention in the matter," she had said last year.
Atiya Sabri, married in 2012, was also divorced on a piece of paper. She approached the Supreme Court in January challenging her divorce.
She has two daughters aged four and three. "Talaq given to me cannot be justified. I need justice as I have to raise my daughters," said Ms Sabri.
Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan
A petition, titled 'Muslim Women's Quest for Equality', was filed by the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA). The BMMA argued that Allah says men and women are equal.
Zakia Soman of the BMMA said, "We have reproduced verses from the Quran about talaq, negotiations and how it should happen over a minimum period of 90 days. The second argument is about gender justice. There is no ambiguity in the Constitution of India about all citizens having equal rights."