The Supreme Court said the high court order, which was hailed as one setting a precedent by a section of the legal fraternity, was "bad in law". "The High Court cannot invoke Information-Technology law in Election law," said the three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, indicating that the two laws cannot be read together.
The top court, however, expressed concerns about the high number of candidates elected unopposed in the state. The figure - which, at 34 per cent, is likely to be an all-time high -- was the result of Trinamool terror that did not allow any competition, opposition parties have alleged. At least 140 candidates belonging to the CPM were banking on filing e-nominations, an advocate representing the party told NDTV.
"What's bothering us is 34 per cent of the candidates have been elected unopposed... Elections to be held in absolute fairness," said the judges. The bench said the state Election Commission cannot issue the notification for unopposed winners now.
The date of the election, however, is still a grey area. The Calcutta High Court, which earlier declared May 14 as the election date, deleted the date in today's order. In place of an exact date, the order now says "whenever".
Holding the Election Commission responsible for free and fair polls, the court refused to go into the nitty-gritty of security. But it said if there is more violence than in 2013, the state will have to pay compensation. "The compensation will be cut from police salaries and property," the order said.
Get Breaking news, live coverage, and Latest News from India and around the world on NDTV.com. Catch all the Live TV action on NDTV 24x7 and NDTV India. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram for latest news and live news updates.