Actor Aditya Pancholi Gets Pre-Arrest Bail In Rape Case

A woman has alleged that the 54-year-old actor, who starred in several Hindi films in the 1990s, sexually assaulted her between 2004 and 2009.

 Share
EMAIL
PRINT
COMMENTS
Actor Aditya Pancholi Gets Pre-Arrest Bail In Rape Case

Aditya Pancholi has denied all the allegations and claimed he has been implicated in a false case.


Mumbai: 

A court in Mumbai on Tuesday granted anticipatory bail to Bollywood actor Aditya Pancholi in a rape case filed by a woman.

Dindoshi sessions court judge H B Gaikwad allowed the pre-arrest bail plea filed by Aditya Pancholi, who has denied the rape and other allegations levelled by the woman, who is also an actor.

The police in suburban Versova had registered a case against Aditya Pancholi under Indian Penal Code sections 376 (rape), 323 (assault), 328 (causing hurt by means of poison) and 384 (extortion) in June on the woman's complaint.

The woman has alleged that the 54-year-old actor, who starred in several Hindi films in the 1990s, sexually assaulted her between 2004 and 2009.

She has also claimed that Aditya Pancholi beat her up and confined her to his house whenever she tried to approach police during this period.

In the complaint, she said Aditya Pancholi demanded Rs 1 crore from her for not showing her private photographs to her family and friends, and claimed that she had paid him Rs 50 lakh.

Aditya Pancholi's lawyer Prashant Patil had submitted before the court that there was no explanation for the delay in registering the complaint and dismissed as "vague" the allegations made against his client.

Mr Patil had also argued that the woman has lied about her date of birth in the complaint.

The woman was not a minor in 2004, as claimed by her, since her date of birth recorded in her passport is March 23, 1986, the lawyer had told court.

If her date of birth mentioned in the passport is taken into consideration, her age in 2004 was more than 18 years, Aditya Pancholi's lawyer had said.

The woman has wrongly stated her date of birth as March 23, 1987, in the complaint and this prima facie shows she is not coming clean on the issue, the lawyer had said.

Her date of birth was different in her complaint and in her passport, and such discrepancies show "her intention to lie", Mr Patil had said.

She filed the complaint only when Aditya Pancholi got a favourable order from a magistrate's court in a defamation case that he had filed against her, the advocate had argued.

Aditya Pancholi has denied all the allegations and claimed he has been implicated in a false case.



Follow NDTV for latest election news and live coverage of assembly elections 2019 in Maharashtra and Haryana.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram for latest news and live news updates.

NDTV Beeps - your daily newsletter

................................ Advertisement ................................

................................ Advertisement ................................

................................ Advertisement ................................