This Article is From Aug 20, 2019

"Just Because Chidambaram Is MP?" Court Explains Why No Anticipatory Bail

Justice Sunil Gaur dismissed the Congress leader's claim that the charges were politically motivated, and said he cannot constrain investigating agencies in such a "massive economic offence".

'Just Because Chidambaram Is MP?' Court Explains Why No Anticipatory Bail

P Chidambaram is accused in the INX Media case, dating back to 2007.

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court today rejected former Union Minister P Chidambaram's request for anticipatory bail, leaving him open to the possibility of being arrested in the INX Media case. The Congress leader's legal team, led by senior advocate Kapil Sibal, is expected to challenge the order in Supreme Court. The court said Mr Chidambaram appears to be the "kingpin" in the case, and gave reasons for denying him relief in the case.

Here are the top five points of this story:

  1. Justice Sunil Gaur said Mr Chidambaram's involvement in the case has been prima facie revealed, and anticipatory bail cannot be granted just because he is an MP. He also rejected the former minister's claim that he was being targeted by the BJP-led centre for political reasons.

  2. "It is preposterous to say that the prosecution of Chidambaram is baseless, politically motivated and an act of vendetta. It is a classic case of money laundering," the judge said, adding that the hands of investigating agencies cannot be tied up in such a "massive economic offence".

  3. The court further said that the "magnitude and enormity" of material produced by the investigating agencies "dis-entitles him from any pre-arrest bail". Mr Chidambaram had been "uncooperative with investigations and evasive in his replies", he added.

  4. The former Union Minister came under the scanner after probe agencies accused his son, Karti Chidambaram, of receiving kickbacks in exchange for allowing INX Media, a television company, to receive foreign funds amounting to Rs 305 crore under the UPA government in 2007.

  5. The Supreme Court did not accord Mr Chidambaram an urgent hearing for his appeal against the Delhi Court order. "We came to court and requested Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi. He said please move the senior-most judge (in the morning)," Kapil Sibal told mediapersons.



Post a comment
.