This Article is From Sep 16, 2019

Delhi Court Adjourns Aircel-Maxis Case Against P Chidambaram Indefinitely

Special Judge OP Saini adjourned the matter without giving any date for further hearing, saying that the prosecution may approach the court as and when the investigation is complete.

Delhi Court Adjourns Aircel-Maxis Case Against P Chidambaram Indefinitely

P Chidambaram and Karti Chidambaram are being questioned by CBI and ED in the Aircel-Maxis case

New Delhi:

A Delhi court today adjourned the Aircel-Maxis case, involving former Union Minister P Chidambaram and his son Karti, indefinitely, noting that probe agencies CBI and Enforcement Directorate were seeking repeated adjournments.

Special Judge OP Saini adjourned the matter without giving any date for further hearing, saying that the prosecution may approach the court as and when the investigation is complete.

The court on Thursday granted anticipatory bail to the Chidambarams in the corruption case filed by the CBI as well as in the money laundering matter lodged by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in relation to the Aircel-Maxis deal.

The matter was listed for arguments on the cognizance of chargesheet in the case.

However, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Special Public Prosecutor Nitesh Rana, appearing for the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate respectively, sought adjournment on the ground that response to Letters Rogatory (LRs) were awaited.

The agencies requested the court to adjourn the matter for first week in October.

"Prosecution seeking date after dates. Matter deferred sine die (indefinitely). Prosecution asked to approach the Court as and when the investigation is complete and as and when they receive Letters Rogatory (LRs) from various countries," the court said.

CBI and the Enforcement Directorate are probing how Karti Chidambaram received clearance from the Foreign Investment Promotion Board or FIPB for the Aircel-Maxis deal in 2006 when his father P Chidambaram was Union finance minister.

CBI and the Enforcement Directorate had alleged that the Congress leader, as finance minister during the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) regime, granted approval to the deal beyond his capacity benefiting certain persons, and received kickbacks.
 

.