- Top court had pulled up the Jammu lawyers for barring the legal process
- Family's lawyer complained of threats from the High Court Bar Association
- The association claimed it is being unfairly portrayed in national media
The top court had earlier pulled up the Jammu lawyers for obstructing the legal process. On April 13, the Supreme Court took suo motu notice of the lawyers of Jammu and Kathua bar associations preventing the police from entering the court and preventing the family's lawyer from appearing in the case.
The protest by the lawyers had been one of the key fallouts of the shocking gangrape and murder of an eight-year-old child in the state, that has triggered a nationwide outrage.
The state police said the child was subjected to horrific tortures to scare off the nomadic Bakerwal community, to which she belonged, from Jammu's Hindu majority areas.
In Jammu and Kashmir, the case, however, triggered a backlash, with a groundswell of support for the accused. It was alleged that the state's lawyers' were a part of that section and had not allowed the filing of chargesheet in the case.
Denying her allegations, the Jammu High Court Bar Association has told the Supreme Court that her statements are "contradictory".
The association also said they were being unfairly portrayed as communal in the national media. Their demand for a CBI inquiry was meant to ensure justice in the case and their protest was against the illegal presence of Rohingyas and Bangladeshi nationals in Jammu.
The Supreme Court will hear the matter again on April 30.
Get Breaking news, live coverage, and Latest News from India and around the world on NDTV.com. Catch all the Live TV action on NDTV 24x7 and NDTV India. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram for latest news and live news updates.