Who Created Aarogya Setu? RTI Body Pulls Up Government Over Evasive Reply

The Central Information Commission has issued notice to the government for "evasive answers" on who created the Aarogya Setu app.

Aarogya Setu App: Centre pushed Aarogya Setu as an essential tool in fight against Covid.

New Delhi:

Millions of Indians have installed the Aarogya Setu, a contact tracing app that the government pushed as an essential tool in the fight against the coronavirus. But while Aarogya Setu's website says it was developed by the National Informatics Centre and the Information Technology ministry, both have denied knowledge of who created the app in response to a Right to Information query.

The Central Information Commission has issued notice to the government for "evasive answers" on who created the Aarogya Setu app.

"Denial of information by authorities cannot be accepted," the top RTI body says in the notice.

"None of the Chief Public Information Officers were able to explain anything regarding who created the app, where are the files, and this is extremely preposterous."

The departments concerned have been asked to appear before the commission on November 24.

Activist Saurav Das had complained to the information commission that various ministries had failed to provide information about the creation of the app.

He had asked for details like the origin of the proposal for the app, its approval details, the companies involved, individuals and government departments included, and copies of communications between private people involved in developing the app.

Newsbeep

Over a period of two months, the query bounced off various departments.

The National Informatics Centre reportedly said that the "entire file related to creation of the App is not with NIC".

The IT ministry transferred the query to the National e-Governance Division, which said: "The information sought is not related to (our division)."

The RTI body has also issued show-cause notices to Chief Public Information Officers  and the National e-Governance Division.

The information commission questions in the notice why the government should not face action for "prima facie obstruction of information" and giving an "evasive reply" to the RTI application.