Israel's decades-long occupation of the Palestinian territories is illegal and needs to end "as rapidly as possible", the UN's top court said Friday.
The UN's General Assembly asked the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in late 2022 to give an "advisory opinion" on the "legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem".
-
Who Is Rajiv Mehta? Lilavati Hospital Trustee To Speak At NDTV World Summit 2026 -
Ex-CIA Director To Decode 'War In Times Of AI' At NDTV World Summit -
From Call Centre To Billion-Dollar Disruptor: Nikhil Kamath At NDTV World Summit -
'Every 5 Years, You'll See A New India': Swami Sarvapriyananda Ahead Of NDTV World Summit -
AI Can Think, But Can It Be Conscious? Swami Sarvapriyananda Weighs In -
Alain Ebobisse, Africa50 CEO, To Attend NDTV World Summit 2026. All About Him -
Kriti Sanon At NDTV World Summit: A Look At Her Career And Business Ventures -
Ex-CIA Director To Decode 'War In Times Of AI' At NDTV World Summit -
Who Is Vikram Rai, CEO, South Asia GE Aerospace, Set To Attend The NDTV World Summit 2026 -
Rahul Kanwal: The World Is Changing. What Comes Next? | NDTV World Summit 2026
"The court has found that Israel's continued presence in the Palestinian Territories is illegal," ICJ presiding judge Nawaf Salam said Friday, adding: "Israel must end the occupation as rapidly as possible."
"The Court has found that Israel's... continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is illegal," Salam said.
"The State of Israel is under the obligation to bring an end to its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as rapidly as possible," the judge said.
The ICJ held a week-long session in February to hear submissions from countries following the request -- supported by most countries within the assembly.
Most speakers during the hearings called on Israel to end its 57-year occupation. They warned a prolonged occupation posed an "extreme danger" to stability in the Middle East and beyond.
But the United States said Israel should not be legally obliged to withdraw without taking its "very real security needs" into account.
Israel did not take part in the oral hearings.
Instead, it submitted a written contribution in which it described the questions the court had been asked as "prejudicial" and "tendentious".
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world