Babri Title Suit Verdict

Just 72 hours after the Supreme Court verdict on the Ayodhya title suit dispute, Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha has shot off a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi demanding criminal cases against Ker Sevaks for bringing down the Babri Masjid, be withdrawn.

Article 142 of the Constitution, which grants the Supreme Court special powers, wasinvoked twice by the five-judge Constitution bench while delivering the landmark verdict in the Ayodhya title suit on Saturday. The court said in view of the evidence, the disputed 2.77 acres of land was awarded for a temple, but it invoked the Article 142 to grant 5...

A lawyer for the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board - one of the respondents in the Ayodhya title suit -- has expressed dissatisfaction with the verdict of the Supreme Court that awarded the 2.77 acres of disputed land to Ram Lalla for the construction of a temple and said an alternate five-acre plot will be given for a mosque. The board said t...

Volunteers of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) have been asked by their leaders to refrain from taking out processions or raising slogans if the upcoming judgment in the Babri Mosque-Ram Temple title suit case comes in their favour, sources say.

Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind chief Arshad Madani on Wednesday said the Supreme Court judgment in the Babri Masjid-Ram Temple title suit case should be based on facts and evidence and not on faith and belief. Appealing to the people of the country to maintain peace and harmony, he said his organization will respect the verdict even if it is adverse.

Daily hearings in the politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya will end at 5 pm, Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi said today. "We will rise by 5 pm. Enough is enough," Chief Justice Gogoi said after a lawyer asked the Supreme Court for more time for arguments in the Ayodhya case. The Ayodhya mediation panel is l...

Ayodhya Ram Mandir: Muslim respondents in the Ayodhya case contended today that there was no claim for the title in the Ayodhya land by the Hindus until 1989. The Muslims never lost the title, the Muslim petitioners, led by the Sunni Wakf Board maintained at today's hearing of the Ayodhya title suit at the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court today delivered a verdict that has huge implications for deciding whether a temple can be built on the spot where the Babri Masjid was razed in Ayodhya in 1992. The top court said today that it will not review an earlier verdict, delivered in 1994, about whether a mosque is fundamental to the practice of Islam. With this judgement...

A day after the landmark Ayodhya verdict, the Home Minister, P Chidambaram made it clear that the resolution of the title suit has nothing to do with the criminal case against those who demolished the Babri Masjid in December 1992.  (Read: Verdict doesn't justify Babri demolition, says Chidambaram)While there was no violence after Thursday's j...

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has pronounced judgment in the Ayodhya title suit today.The 3-judge bench has ruled in a majority judgement 2:1, that one-third part of the disputed land will go to the Sunni Waqf Board, one-third to the Nirmohi Akhara and one-third to the party for 'Ram Lalla'.Justice S U Khan, in his judgement on the ...

Political parties today welcomed the Allahabad High Court verdict on the Ayodhya title suits with the BJP, which spearheaded the Ramjanmabhoomi movement, terming it as a "positive" development".Congress also welcomed the Ayodhya judgement saying everyone should accept it and no one should treat it as a victory or defeat."Congress has held that the ...

Justice S U Khan, Justice Sudhir Agarwal and Justice D V Sharma start the proceedings to pronounce the judgement in the Ayodhya title suit.The litigants have reached Court No. 21 of the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court.Barricades have been erected about 100 metres from the court room and no one other than those connected with the case ar...

Speaking on the Ayodhya verdict, Home Minster P Chidambaram said the Centre had taken adequate measures and deployed sufficient security personnel across the country. Almost 2 lakh policemen have been deployed in Uttar Pradesh. "Centre has taken adequate measures and deployed adequate forces to help the state governments maintain law and order. ...

Ahead of the Ayodhya title suit verdict, the Centre has identified 32 locations across the country where it apprehends trouble and kept forces in readiness at 16 places for quick deployment, including by heavy lift aircraft like IL-76.Firming up its contingency plans in view of the verdict on the sensitive issue on Thursday, the Home Ministry has i...

60 years after the Babri Masjid dispute was first dragged to court, the Allahabad High Court was to deliver a judgement September 24, on what stood on here first - the Ram Janmbhoomi or the Babri Masjid. But Ramesh Chandra Tripathi's intervention has forced a last-minute rethink on whether delivering the Judgment. ''I have requested the court, that...

Just 72 hours after the Supreme Court verdict on the Ayodhya title suit dispute, Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha has shot off a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi demanding criminal cases against Ker Sevaks for bringing down the Babri Masjid, be withdrawn.

Article 142 of the Constitution, which grants the Supreme Court special powers, wasinvoked twice by the five-judge Constitution bench while delivering the landmark verdict in the Ayodhya title suit on Saturday. The court said in view of the evidence, the disputed 2.77 acres of land was awarded for a temple, but it invoked the Article 142 to grant 5...

A lawyer for the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board - one of the respondents in the Ayodhya title suit -- has expressed dissatisfaction with the verdict of the Supreme Court that awarded the 2.77 acres of disputed land to Ram Lalla for the construction of a temple and said an alternate five-acre plot will be given for a mosque. The board said t...

Volunteers of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) have been asked by their leaders to refrain from taking out processions or raising slogans if the upcoming judgment in the Babri Mosque-Ram Temple title suit case comes in their favour, sources say.

Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind chief Arshad Madani on Wednesday said the Supreme Court judgment in the Babri Masjid-Ram Temple title suit case should be based on facts and evidence and not on faith and belief. Appealing to the people of the country to maintain peace and harmony, he said his organization will respect the verdict even if it is adverse.

Daily hearings in the politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya will end at 5 pm, Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi said today. "We will rise by 5 pm. Enough is enough," Chief Justice Gogoi said after a lawyer asked the Supreme Court for more time for arguments in the Ayodhya case. The Ayodhya mediation panel is l...

Ayodhya Ram Mandir: Muslim respondents in the Ayodhya case contended today that there was no claim for the title in the Ayodhya land by the Hindus until 1989. The Muslims never lost the title, the Muslim petitioners, led by the Sunni Wakf Board maintained at today's hearing of the Ayodhya title suit at the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court today delivered a verdict that has huge implications for deciding whether a temple can be built on the spot where the Babri Masjid was razed in Ayodhya in 1992. The top court said today that it will not review an earlier verdict, delivered in 1994, about whether a mosque is fundamental to the practice of Islam. With this judgement...

A day after the landmark Ayodhya verdict, the Home Minister, P Chidambaram made it clear that the resolution of the title suit has nothing to do with the criminal case against those who demolished the Babri Masjid in December 1992.  (Read: Verdict doesn't justify Babri demolition, says Chidambaram)While there was no violence after Thursday's j...

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has pronounced judgment in the Ayodhya title suit today.The 3-judge bench has ruled in a majority judgement 2:1, that one-third part of the disputed land will go to the Sunni Waqf Board, one-third to the Nirmohi Akhara and one-third to the party for 'Ram Lalla'.Justice S U Khan, in his judgement on the ...

Political parties today welcomed the Allahabad High Court verdict on the Ayodhya title suits with the BJP, which spearheaded the Ramjanmabhoomi movement, terming it as a "positive" development".Congress also welcomed the Ayodhya judgement saying everyone should accept it and no one should treat it as a victory or defeat."Congress has held that the ...

Justice S U Khan, Justice Sudhir Agarwal and Justice D V Sharma start the proceedings to pronounce the judgement in the Ayodhya title suit.The litigants have reached Court No. 21 of the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court.Barricades have been erected about 100 metres from the court room and no one other than those connected with the case ar...

Speaking on the Ayodhya verdict, Home Minster P Chidambaram said the Centre had taken adequate measures and deployed sufficient security personnel across the country. Almost 2 lakh policemen have been deployed in Uttar Pradesh. "Centre has taken adequate measures and deployed adequate forces to help the state governments maintain law and order. ...

Ahead of the Ayodhya title suit verdict, the Centre has identified 32 locations across the country where it apprehends trouble and kept forces in readiness at 16 places for quick deployment, including by heavy lift aircraft like IL-76.Firming up its contingency plans in view of the verdict on the sensitive issue on Thursday, the Home Ministry has i...

60 years after the Babri Masjid dispute was first dragged to court, the Allahabad High Court was to deliver a judgement September 24, on what stood on here first - the Ram Janmbhoomi or the Babri Masjid. But Ramesh Chandra Tripathi's intervention has forced a last-minute rethink on whether delivering the Judgment. ''I have requested the court, that...