Activists have filed petitions objecting against Aadhaar linking saying it breaches the Right to Privacy.
New Delhi:
Aadhaar has been made mandatory for bank accounts and welfare schemes in violation of an earlier order of the Supreme Court that called it voluntary, petitioners opposing the government move told a five-judge bench of the top court today. Instead of making it mandatory for six schemes, as ordered by the court, the government had extended it to 139, said the petitioners, who have challenged the validity of the 12-digit Unique Identification Number in the top court. The court said it would pass an interim order on the issue tomorrow.
The petitioners contend that making Aadhaar mandatory violates the Right to Privacy, which has recently been recognized by the Supreme Court as a fundamental right. The largescale sharing of biometric data like iris scans and finger printing also leaves room for misuse.
The Supreme Court had made Aadhaar voluntary, not compulsory, senior advocate Shyam Dhivan, who was representing the petitioners, told the judges. But a law pushed through parliament last year has given the government power to make it mandatory for accessing any service -- including train and bus travel.
As of now, the Centre demands Aadhaar for 139 schemes, instead of the six schemes cleared by the top court, he said. Aadhaar has been made mandatory for board exams, scholarships and higher education by the education boards and the University Grants Commission. Even HIV-positive patients are denied treatment if they do not have Aadhaar, Mr Dhivan said.
"If the orders of the Supreme Court are not obeyed by the government, then it is a sad day," the counsel added, provoking the court to reply, "Let us not go by rhetoric and hyperbole, let us go by the law".
The top court started the hearing as the December 31 deadline for linking Aadhaar banks and financial transactions and welfare measures neared. But two days ago, in a surprise move, the government extended the date of linking Aadhaar to old bank accounts to March 31, 2018.
For accounts opened after 1 June 2017, Aadhaar, Permanent Account Number or PAN will have to be submitted within six months of opening or by 31 March 2018 -- the later date will be the deadline.
The petitioners contend that making Aadhaar mandatory violates the Right to Privacy, which has recently been recognized by the Supreme Court as a fundamental right. The largescale sharing of biometric data like iris scans and finger printing also leaves room for misuse.
The Supreme Court had made Aadhaar voluntary, not compulsory, senior advocate Shyam Dhivan, who was representing the petitioners, told the judges. But a law pushed through parliament last year has given the government power to make it mandatory for accessing any service -- including train and bus travel.
As of now, the Centre demands Aadhaar for 139 schemes, instead of the six schemes cleared by the top court, he said. Aadhaar has been made mandatory for board exams, scholarships and higher education by the education boards and the University Grants Commission. Even HIV-positive patients are denied treatment if they do not have Aadhaar, Mr Dhivan said.
"If the orders of the Supreme Court are not obeyed by the government, then it is a sad day," the counsel added, provoking the court to reply, "Let us not go by rhetoric and hyperbole, let us go by the law".
The top court started the hearing as the December 31 deadline for linking Aadhaar banks and financial transactions and welfare measures neared. But two days ago, in a surprise move, the government extended the date of linking Aadhaar to old bank accounts to March 31, 2018.
For accounts opened after 1 June 2017, Aadhaar, Permanent Account Number or PAN will have to be submitted within six months of opening or by 31 March 2018 -- the later date will be the deadline.
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world
