Explained: Did World's First Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile Attack Just Happened?

The weapon used by Iran-backed Huthi rebels to attack ships in the Red Sea was not a conventional sea-skimming variety of anti-ship missiles

Explained: Did World's First Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile Attack Just Happened?

US Navy Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Carney transits the Suez Canal

New Delhi:

Did the world just see the first combat use of anti-ship ballistic missiles? Military analysts think so. The weapon used by Iran-backed Huthi rebels to attack ships in the Red Sea was not a conventional sea-skimming variety of anti-ship missiles.

The rebels fired two anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBM) on Tuesday towards the southern Red Sea, where there were multiple commercial ships, but none have reported any damage.

While one of the missiles splashed into the sea quite a distance away from the ships, another reportedly blew up midair. There is speculation the ASBM may have malfunctioned or intercepted by the US Navy.

To understand why the use of an ASBM is a major escalation, the concept of a ballistic missile needs to be understood first. Ballistic missiles fly a U-shaped trajectory. They are powered initially by a rocket or series of rockets in stages, followed by an unpowered trajectory that arches upwards before descending to reach its intended target.

All long-range strategic ballistic missiles reach outside the atmosphere in its peak and then descend towards the Earth in the unpowered stage. Only the warhead reenters the atmosphere in very high speed of 6-8 km per second, which makes it difficult or nearly impossible to intercept them reliably.

Now, the ASBM launched by the Huthi rebels reportedly appear to be smaller, short-range ones that wouldn't reach the atmosphere's edge.

"Perhaps the Houthi attack was not really intended to hit, so much as to serve as a symbolic 'shot-across-the-bow.' It could have even involved regular ballistic missiles assigned to a fixed coordinate at sea, rather than guided anti-ship missiles," journalist Sebastien Roblin wrote in Popular Mechanics.

Still, in the final stage of the warhead speeding to the general direction of the merchant ships, it would be unnerving for the escorting warships if they do not have the proper missile that can intercept such a high-speed incoming threat.

Unlike agile sea-skimming anti-ship missiles that can follow a zigzag route to reduce chances of being intercepted while flying towards its target, an ASBM would not be manoeuvrable enough to reacquire its target.

For example, a ballistic missile can be devastating to a building, but since a ship can move away fast, the effectiveness of the ASBM would be greatly diminished as it may be impossible to make the warhead change direction like a conventional anti-ship missile.

There are also complex ASBMs that use modern technology to ensure a confirmed kill. China's DF-21D ASBM is said to be a highly accurate and effective ASBM. Known as "carrier killers", these ASBMs are meant to hit large, powerful warships and could be used to threaten the US' carrier battle groups.

.