minister. You're in the United Kingdom as I understand it at a time when the US president, in fact just overnight for us here in India issued a new executive order to ensure that a I artificial intelligence doesn't do public harm. Do you believe that developers who do pose a potential risk must share the results of safety tests with the government? Now America wants their industry to do this. Do you want Indian developers to do something like this as well? So one of the things that I would I would certainly like to draw your attention to is that the the the wording. First of all, I welcome what President Biden and the US government have done. I think this open This is in the wake of the historic mou between the US and India when the honourable prime minister visited the US, where the US and India have agreed to collaborate on in a I and in semiconductor and in high performance computing and in quantum computing. So a I is certainly an area where India and the US are going to work very closely together, and I think our basic principles in how we view the Internet and in general and tech in particular. I mean, tech in general and Internet and a I in particular is similar because we have been saying for almost now 24 months that our policies and our approach to regulation is about safety and trust and accountability, safety and trust of our digital NAS and accountability of all the platforms that serve our digital. And that is exactly the language that we have used for the last 24 30 months. And it is good to see that now the US is essentially talking about safety and trust and accountability. Albeit, you know, one or two words may be different, but effectively that talking about safety and trust of the users. And I think that convergence of the leading nations of the world and leading tech nations of the world around making the consumer or the user safety being the primary public policy objective for any tech policy making is a good forward step. Now, In my opinion, different countries will approach this differently in terms of whether there will be disclosure of risks from platforms or there is a need for sand boxing platforms and having sandboxes validate some technologies in a I before it is actually made commercially available to a mass market, or in our case, as India is proposing. And we will certainly strongly propose it in tomorrow's discussion. Here in the UK is that we think we need to create an overall framework of user harm, which is the reciprocal of safety and trust. What kinds of user harm are not permitted by any platform? Whether that's an A I platform, whether it's a consumer tech platform, whether it's a social media platform, that we start regulating the Internet in general and a I in particular through the prism of the safety and trust of those who use it because, you know, when we talk about a IV, sorry, I'm going to ramble on this. A. I is is a technology that is going to enable us to do more with less. So do more good with less. We will certainly become a force multiplier and a kinetic of a digital economy. That is the good news. But the same principle applies to the bad and the harm, which is that a I will be able to amplify and compound in very significant manners the harm and the criminality elements of the Internet as we know today,
