Opinion | The India-China Thaw Needs Eyes Wide Open
India and China have quickened their rapprochement, driven less by trust, which remains scarce, than by necessity. In a multipolar world, permanent allies and lasting rivals are illusions.

A cautious rapprochement between India and China has been underway since the Kazan Summit in October 2024, and this year has already seen a surge of bilateral exchanges across government, think tanks, media and academia. The reset has delivered progress on visa relaxations, pilgrimage resumptions, people-to-people ties and soon, direct flights. Talks on trade and economic cooperation continue. Yet, caution remains the defining feature, reinforced by Beijing's support for Pakistan during Operation Sindoor and its curbs on rare earth magnets, tunnel-boring equipment, advanced goods and specialist personnel. Recent tariff impositions, however, have given new urgency to the reset, underscored by the visit of Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi to Delhi. The breadth and depth of the agreements emerging from these talks suggest that the rapprochement is gaining pace, even amid persistent suspicion.
The Ever-Present Schism
The 2020 Galwan clash and subsequent standoff dealt a major setback to India-China relations, deepening mistrust and discrediting earlier agreements. For nearly five years, the freeze held, despite consistent military and diplomatic talks that produced buffer zones and revised patrolling protocols as a temporary modus vivendi. The thaw initiated at Kazan, however, has yet to percolate down to the Line of Actual Control. Troop disengagement has taken place, but not de-escalation, demobilisation or meaningful progress on border delimitation, although recent accords hint at new ideas. Both sides still deploy about 60,000 troops each along the frontier, leaving the peace fragile at best.
Also Read | "Unilateral Bullying Rampant": What China Told India Amid Trump Tariff War
Moreover, structural tensions continue to shape the relationship. China champions multipolarity at the global level but resists a multipolar Asia, which India prefers. Beijing's naval presence in the Indian Ocean has expanded substantially over the years, while its hard competitive line in South Asia shows little sign of easing. Frictions also persist over the trade restrictions, the South China Sea, Taiwan, Tibet and Pakistan. Beijing continues to arm India's rivals, while New Delhi has begun to market weapons to Southeast Asia. As India's economic and diplomatic profile grows, competition for resources, markets and influence in the Global South and beyond with China appears set to intensify.
What's Driving The Rapprochement?
Yet, both India and China are bound by geography, and no bilateral rupture can erase that reality. Together, home to nearly 3 billion people, these neighbouring giants remain strikingly uninformed about one another. Mutual ignorance, at both societal and policy levels, has hindered meaningful engagement for decades. Yet, in an era defined by multipolarity, economic interdependence and strategic recalibration, looking past each other is a luxury neither country can afford.
China offers valuable lessons in urban planning, digital infrastructure, green energy, and frontier technologies such as artificial intelligence. Its venture capital ecosystem is deep, its manufacturing capacity unmatched. India, on the other hand, provides what China increasingly needs: a vast, growing, and relatively stable market. If the two can forge even a modestly functional economic partnership, the ripple effects could benefit the broader Asian region.
Also Read | Opinion: The Dragon And The Elephant Must Dance
India offers China both scale and security for long-term investment. Grand projects such as the BRI, GSI, GDI or the stalled BCIM corridor have delivered little, weighed down by mistrust and geopolitics. By contrast, sectoral engagement, tourism, agricultural machinery, consumer goods and other practical areas offer faster returns with lower risk. With global growth slowing and supply chains shifting, India's scale and China's capital and expertise create natural complementarities. Proximity lowers costs, while consumer demand on both sides offers depth. Incremental, commercially grounded initiatives may lack fanfare, but they can generate jobs, boost trade flows and, over time, lay the foundation for broader strategic stability.
No Permanent Friends
Multipolarity is no longer a distant forecast; it is taking shape now. India already ranks as the world's most populous nation, its fourth-strongest military power, and is on course to become the third-largest economy. In a multipolar world, permanent allies and lasting rivals are illusions. What matters and endures is national interest. For India, this means a pragmatic stance: every state is a partner until proven otherwise, while the neighbourhood commands priority and creative diplomacy. Multipolarity will normalise fluid alignments and overlapping coalitions, pushing states to hedge, seek leverage, and widen their options. It is in this context that India and China have quickened their rapprochement, driven less by trust, which remains scarce, than by necessity. The much-talked-about "Trump factor" remains marginal in this rebuilding of ties but will certainly inform choices going forward. New Delhi will continue to seek convergence with Beijing, wherever possible, even while building its own deterrent capabilities.
(Harsh V Pant is Vice President, Observer Research Foundation (ORF), New Delhi. Atul is a Fellow, China Studies, at ORF.)
Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author
-
Opinion | The Northeasterner: Indian, Until Someone Needs A Punchline - By Vir Sanghvi
The racism we casually throw at those from the North East is not so different - or any less offensive - from the racism that Indians face in the West. Yet, we remain blind to it.
-
Opinion | The 'Real' Message To Trump And Pak In Taliban Minister's India Visit
To Trump, Taliban has made it clear that it is in no mood to rekindle American presence in Afghanistan. And to Pakistan, it seems to be signalling a newfound independence in its policies and activities.
-
Tata Trusts Infighting Over Board Seats. NDTV Explains What Happened And Why
Tata Trusts owns around 66 per cent of Tata Sons, which is the Tata Group's investments holding company.
-
Opinion | To Just Welcome The 'Immigrant' Is Not The Point - By Shashi Tharoor
Nations have the right to regulate entry, to balance openness with cohesion. But the tone of the current moment suggests something more corrosive - a retreat not just from policy generosity, but from moral imagination.
-
Opinion | 'Pasni' Offer Proves Pak Can Betray Anyone - Even China - For A Deal
China has consistently supported Pakistan - diplomatically, economically, and militarily - even during Islamabad's periods of isolation. Yet, despite this "iron brotherhood", Pakistan's recent moves show that loyalty in Islamabad is negotiable.
-
How 2 Ms - Mandir And Mandal - Helped Lalu Yadav Find 'MY' Formula In Bihar
Much has been written and said about the MY formula and its role in shaping the montage that Bihar politics is. But how did Lalu Yadav crack this formula that has endured for over three decades?
-
Opinion | Why China's 'Assured Retaliation' Nuclear Doctrine Has Sent Others Into A Spiral
China's investment in long-range delivery systems is understandably directed towards the US. But its continuous development of intermediate delivery systems has sent its neighbours into a tizzy.
-
NDTV Exclusive: Beats Beneath Rubble - Gaza Rapper Turns Survival Into Song
The line between politics and art in Gaza has always been thin but since October 2023, it has been all but erased.
-
NDTV Exclusive: He Once Built Software, Now Struggles To Survive In Gaza
Two since October 7, 2023, as Israeli and Hamas officials gather in Egypt's Sharm el-Sheikh for indirect ceasefire negotiations under a US-led peace plan, Omar Aldalou stands on the rubble of his destroyed home.
-
Explained: India-Pak Sir Creek Border Dispute And Its Strategic Importance
On Thursday Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said attempts to illegally occupy more of India, i.e., its half of Sir Creek, will be met with a response that will change "history and geography".