But But you say that there was an ideological turn within your party with the eight Nath Cindy factions saying that you had given up on Hindutva and core Hindu tha in fact, again coming back to you. They seem to resent your sort of more progressive approach to politics and, you know, felt that you had deviated from the court agenda of the party. And if you see, to be honest, in the last 2.5 years of work, never have I ever spoken or criticised anyone in the last 2.5 years. There's not an iota of politics that we've actually played that thing. The real disadvantage we had is we may not be seen as the hard call politicians and probably good people do not have a place in politics in our country today. But having said that, if going to divorce and getting about 50,000 crores for the state is wrong, maybe we were wrong is going to cop 26 speaking about the climate agenda in trying to push the climate agenda, sustainable development, trying to bring younger people women, people who have more perspectives than just one into the mainstream. If that is a problem, maybe that is a bigger problem. But I guess that's what Not something you know he had to accept. We're here to listen to more perspectives. Have Maharashtra that was peaceful in the last 2.5 years. Not have common attentions. Flare up. And yet we were the party that went to a out there after the swearing in this down. The chief minister's been there twice after being sworn in. Have gone there. I think the perspective of what they proceeded to to to be is way different from what, you know, a Hindu Ressam babysit track recorded to be or the party president thinks it to be or the larger people in Maharashtra. Can you tell me what that difference is? It's interesting that you say that you're saying you're not giving up on her Hindu for, but at the same time all these other issues, whether it's about the environment, investment, you know that that's not a contradiction to Hindu or relying with the Congress of the NCP. Exactly so I mean, I do not think it's even imperative right now to, you know, answer whatever allegations are making because people know it is a joke. People know it is. They have no other reason than to have their own higher ambitions and monsters ambition. So I think even responding to the allegations or such, you know, things that the same would be a joke for us. But, you know, they claimed that they were very uncomfortable with this whole alliance from the beginning with the Congress and the NCP. Did they say anything to any of these guys today who who have now rebelled against against the Chief Minister that they ever make their displeasure publicly known to you and your father? To be very honest in the past 2.5 years? If you see whenever the chief minister has been placed, he has said that beat the covered work with the infrastructure work, be the importance Mumbai got for the first time in the history of you know, whatever years that had the credit was always shed by the Chief Minister with every colleague asses the person who has this ambitions and called off the started with the rebellion he was given a department which know Chief Minister has parted within the last 33 years. More importantly, if it all there were differences, you could have just come home and spoken. Most importantly in this is differences will always be there in any political alliance. You've seen enough differences in the alliance in the past five years, when we are in India government year, you have differences at every level, horizontally and vertically. In politics, it is always about competition, and if it all their differences, what mature people do, what in divisions do is sit down and sort it out.
