The Supreme Court on Wednesday turned down Congress leader Ahmed Patel's petition seeking dismissal of a Gujarat High Court order to proceed with the hearing of an election petition by Balwantsinh Rajput challenging his election to the Rajya Sabha in 2017.
The bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice AM Khanwilkar and Justice DY Chandrachud upheld the High Court order in one of the petitions filed by the losing candidate while setting aside the High Court's order in another petition.
-
World-Class Chefs, Food And Music: The Fun Side Of NDTV World Summit 2026 -
AI, Consciousness And Dharma: Why Ancient Indian Wisdom Matters Now -
NDTV World Summit: What To Expect From PM Modi's Keynote Address -
NDTV World Summit 2026: What To Watch Out For | PM Modi, Jaishankar, AI And Global Power Shifts -
A World Between Orders: What To Expect At NDTV World Summit 2026 -
Who Is Rajiv Mehta? Lilavati Hospital Trustee To Speak At NDTV World Summit 2026 -
Alain Ebobisse, Africa50 CEO, To Attend NDTV World Summit 2026. All About Him -
Kriti Sanon At NDTV World Summit: A Look At Her Career And Business Ventures -
Ex-CIA Director To Decode 'War In Times Of AI' At NDTV World Summit -
Who Is Vikram Rai, CEO, South Asia GE Aerospace, Set To Attend The NDTV World Summit 2026
Allowing Mr Patel's appeal in part, the Supreme Court asked the parties to appear before the High Court for de novo consideration of the application and to complete the hearing on it preferably in one month.
Earlier in July, the top court had asked the high court not to proceed with the hearing of the election petition after the framing of issues.
Mr Patel had questioned the maintainability of Mr Rajput's election petition before the high court contending that it is not backed with required documents.
Not accepting the Mr Patel's contention on the maintainability of the election petition by Mr Rajput, the high court had held that petitioner had substantially complied with the requirements of documents to be filed under the law and other defects can be addressed in due course, and ordered the trial.
Mr Rajput had alleged that Ahmed Patel indulged in corrupt practice by lodging 44 MLAs in a hotel in Bengaluru.
He had also contested the Election Commission's decision to invalidate two votes by Congress MLAs -Raghavji Patel and Bholabhai Gohel -- who had rebelled against the party.
Mr Rajput had contended that once the Returning Officer has exercised his discretion and accepted two votes by rebel Congress lawmakers, the Election Commission had no jurisdiction to interfere with the decision and issue direction to the Returning Officer.
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world