Pop star Katy Perry won an appeal on Friday in a trademark case brought by Australian fashion designer Katie Taylor, who markets her clothing under the name Katie Perry, USA Today reported.
A panel of three judges overturned a 2023 ruling that had sided with Taylor, allowing Katy Perry (born Katheryn Hudson) to continue using her stage name to sell merchandise in Australia despite Taylor's trademark claim.
-
Chatbots Could Be Damaging Adult Learning Too: Andrew Ng -
Swami Sarvapriyananda Asks On AI Alignment; Andrew Ng Flags Risks Of Overhyping AI Fears -
"Keep Learning New Skills, Jobs Will be There": Andrew Ng On 'AI Jobapocalypse' Fear At NDTV World Summit -
"Keep Learning New Skills": Andrew Ng On 'AI Jobapocalypse' Fear -
Nikhil Kamath Recalls Satya Nadella's Remark: 'I Don't Touch An Indian Product' In The US -
NDTV World Summit 2026: What Nikhil Kamath Said On Inheritance Tax -
Mohini Dey Says She Carries Her Roots Wherever She Goes: 'I Am A Bengali Girl' -
Nikhil Kamath Shows 'Delay Gratification' Tattoo, Reveals Mantra Behind It -
NDTV World Summit 2026: What Nikhil Kamath Said On Inheritance Tax -
Not Another News Platform: What Nikhil Kamath Wants To Build Next
The judges determined that Perry had used her name as a trademark for five years before Taylor began her clothing business and already had an "international reputation in music and entertainment, if not more broadly." As a result, Perry was deemed entitled to use her stage name in Australia.
The court also cancelled Taylor's trademark registration, according to USA Today.
"This case is unfortunate in that two enterprising women in different countries independently adopted their name as a trademark, unaware of each other's existence," the judges wrote in their decision. They also noted that Taylor had, at times, appeared to associate herself with Perry, raising the risk of consumer confusion or deception.
However, little confusion resulted, and the court found. Since Perry offered both women rights to the trademarked name in 2009, which Taylor rejected, the judges ruled that Taylor's own trademark license would need to be cancelled. "In that sense, (Taylor) has brought this result on herself. Unfortunately, it is no longer possible to return to the time of peaceful co-existence," they wrote.
Disappointed with the decision, Taylor told The Guardian, "This case proves a trademark isn't worth the paper it's printed on."
She went on to say: "My fashion label has been a dream of mine since I was 11 years old and now that dream that I have worked so hard for, since 2006, has been taken away."
"I have lost everything, including my trademark. As you can imagine I'm devastated," she told The New York Post.
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world