F-35 Hit Over Iran? Hi-Tech Solution To Low-Tech Problem Likely Backfired
Iran developed air defence systems that use passive infrared sensors rather than radar to target aircraft like F-35A. This method proved effective in Yemen when used by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels
Stealth is a promise, not a guarantee. The US Air Force's F-35A Lightning 2 is the most expensive weapons programme in history, built around the premise that it can slip through the most contested airspace undetected.
Despite that, an F-35A was forced to make an emergency landing at an undisclosed American base in the Middle East on Thursday after flying a combat mission over Iran, the Pentagon has confirmed. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has claimed it struck the aircraft. The US military said it is investigating the claim.
Central Command (CENTCOM) spokesperson Captain Tim Hawkins said the F-35A was flying a combat mission over Iran when it was forced to divert. The aircraft landed safely and the pilot is in stable condition.
While nothing concrete is known whether Iranian fire forced the landing or what weapon Iran used, the IRGC released a video through Iran's Fars News Agency claiming to show a missile striking the F-35 on its port side.
NDTV could not independently verify the authenticity of the video.
ALSO READ | The Myth Of Stealth: Iran Puts US' Prized F-35's Name To The Test
If confirmed, it would mark the first time a US crewed aircraft has been struck by Iranian fire since Operation Epic Fury began on February 28. The incident is also more significant for what it reveals about the F-35's vulnerabilities than for the tactical damage alone.
The aircraft's stealth capabilities are calibrated primarily to defeat radar-based detection systems; it is shaped to scatter radio-frequency emissions and coated with materials that absorb them.
What it cannot do is eliminate its heat signature entirely.

Iran has developed air defence systems that use passive infrared sensors rather than radar to target aircraft. This method had already proved effective in Yemen when used by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels.
Passive systems are particularly dangerous because they emit no radio signals of their own. A radar-warning receiver on an aircraft detects incoming radar emissions, as against a passive infrared tracker that is silent right up to the moment of impact. These improvised or jury-rigged systems provide little to no early warning of a threat, let alone an incoming attack.
While the F-35A carries its own Distributed Aperture System, which is a network of six infrared cameras providing 360-degree situational awareness, detection and evasion are different problems.

The Houthi rebels, armed with far cruder systems than what Iran has, had already shown this gap. US F-35s flying against Houthi air defences were forced to take evasive actions in order to avoid being hit by surface-to-air missiles.
The trajectory of Operation Epic Fury has compounded this exposure. General Dan Caine, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters that US aircraft are now flying farther east and penetrating deeper into Iranian airspace. This region is where Iran's road-mobile air defence systems that are hard to locate and destroy are concentrated.

Road-mobile systems can be repositioned after each engagement and concealed in ordinary terrain. They can be hidden virtually anywhere and will remain a threat on the battlefield long after fixed air defences are destroyed.
Non-stealthy A-10 ground attack jets and AH-64E Apache helicopters are operating along the Iranian coast over the Strait of Hormuz in a sign that the US considers Iran's western airspace manageable and safe. Iran's eastern interior, however, is a different world.
The US has so far lost over a dozen military aircraft since the war began. Three F-15E Strike Eagles were downed in a Kuwaiti friendly fire incident on March 2. A KC-135 Stratotanker crashed in western Iraq on March 12, killing all six crew.
-
Anga-Banga-Kalinga: How BJP Completed Its Eastern India Arc
Election Results 2026: For the BJP, what is unfolding is the completion of a political corridor across the eastern flank of the country from Bihar to West Bengal to Odisha.
-
Opinion | The Rise Of Vijay, The Fall Of Stalin - And A Puzzle For Palaniswami
For the defeated Stalin, this verdict is almost a reminder of the misfortune that beset his father, who was brought down by Jayalalithaa in 1991, 2001 and 2011. Except that his father never lost an assembly seat.
-
Opinion | The 'Silent' Bengal Voter Was Always Keeping Score. Mamata Just Didn't See It
Bengal is not an easy audience. So if the saffron wave has broken in here, the deepest explanation is this: people did not vote only for a party. They voted for a different emotional contract.
-
Opinion | They Sniggered At Vijay In 2024. That Was DMK-AIADMK's Biggest Mistake
The mistake the DMK and AIADMK made vis-a-vis Vijay was to underestimate him. They did not realise what he quietly took away from them in two years.
-
India Sees Red: Left May Be Left With No Government In The Country
When the first elections were held in the country in 1951-52, it was the Communist Party of India that had the highest number of seats among Opposition parties in the Lok Sabha.
-
MK Stalin: The Boy From Chennai's Marina Beach
From a naming ceremony on Chennai's Marina Beach in 1953 to Tamil Nadu Chief Minister - this is the story of Muthuvel Karunanidhi Stalin, the DMK, and the 2026 election.
-
NTR, MGR, Jayalalithaa, Rajinikanth, Pawan Kalyan - Vijay, Respectfully, Is None Of Them
Vijay is unlike anything Tamil Nadu has ever seen. Comparing him to other star-turned-politicians is tempting, but unfair.
-
From Climbing On JP's Car To Ousting Left: Mamata Banerjee's Bengal Journey
Mamata Banerjee's political journey is a testament that she is at her most ferocious when she faces a difficult battle
-
Opinion | 35 US Lawmakers Just Moved A Bill That Could Upend Indian Techies' Careers
For years, Indian students going to America have followed a set path: F-1 student visa, then OPT, and later an H-1B visa. That may soon be off the table, thanks to a group of American lawmakers.