Opinion | Why Trump And Mamdani May Not Be That Different, After All
Both Trump and Mamdani seem to be offering an emotional appeal that targets the same problem: an unaffordable America that has alienated its large majority.
This Thanksgiving, many Americans might be willing to endure an irate Uncle at the dinner table, just the way Zohran Mamdani expected President Donald Trump to be when they met at the White House. The unexpected cordiality instead has had opinions reeling. The premise is more astute. I am reminded of George Soros telling me, over piping hot masala chai on the icy Davos slopes, that "life is a series of imperfect but necessary choices". Both Trump and Mamdani seem to be following this advice. They both offer an emotional appeal that targets the same problem: an unaffordable America that has alienated its large majority.
There is, however, one key difference. Trump's MAGA blames immigrants, while Mamdani's Democratic socialists blame the rich. Both are practising identity politics - one based on your race or place of birth and the other based on your financial success.
But while both indulge in the blame game, neither offers a real, long-term solution. Because there is no easy one. The smartest people in the world are scratching their heads to offer an alternative to the millions whose jobs were displaced in the post-globalisation era, let alone those obliterated by the furiously unfurling AI tsunami. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell recently admitted the inability of the world's largest monetary authority to meet this challenge, saying AI has left job creation close to zero.
The money is firmly in the hands of the super rich. The top 1% of the American population owns nearly a half of the US stock market, while the bottom 50% of Americans altogether hold only 1%. This is the biggest conundrum of our time.
Yes, stock markets and corporate profits are near all time highs, but the vast majority of America is feeling left out in this second coming of the Gilded Age. The beneficiaries of wealth creation in our current times are the rich and Wall Street, not the working class and Main Street.
This disparity has led to a political earthquake in America, and arguably in every country around the world, where the super-rich, through funding political frontrunners or controlling resources, are dictating policies to the vast majority. To win an election in America, you need billionaire support, and they need you to pick up the phone line when they call. Quid pro quo.
This billionaire boys' club is now dominating America's public square. Both Trump and Mamdani are rebuttals by the people. And much like life, their politics are imperfect but necessary choices.
As an immigrant myself, it is hard to get my head around the anti-immigrant policies of Trump's MAGA. But as someone who grew up in the 1980s' pre-liberalisation socialist India, it is also hard to comprehend Mamdani's economics. India's own failed experiment with socialist democracy enabled its oligarchs to gain unchecked power, whose influence even today - whether in politics or business, and irrespective of party in power - is impossible to shirk off.
This political conundrum is both a moral choice for individuals, but also a generational choice testing family loyalties. During the mayoral voting at the American Museum of Natural History, a woman in her 60s told me she had voted for Trump for President but her Ivy League-educated Gen Z sons were voting for Mamdani. She said she voted from her mind, and they voted from their hearts.
That is the dichotomy of most Americans right now. Will you choose the anti-immigrant, MAGA right or the anti-rich Democratic socialists? Ultimately, politics is performance and a promise.
Zohran Mamdani is no stranger to the power of performance. He can marry the charm of DDLJ's Shahrukh Khan in person with the fire of Deewar's Amithabh Bachchan on stage. And in his own way, Donald Trump, the consummate reality TV OG, knows how to stay in the spotlight and dominate the headlines.
Ronald Reagan famously said, "All great change in America begins at the dinner table." As Americans come together this week to celebrate Thanksgiving, families will talk about ideologies that provide answers to their crisis of unaffordability. And they will understand why Donald Trump was surprisingly cordial with Zohran Mamdani.
Both the leaders have ascended for the same reason, promising Americans a return to abundance beyond the Thanksgiving table. But till one of them provides a real solution, Americans will continue to face this challenging conundrum.
(Namrata Brar is an Indian-American journalist, investigative reporter, and news anchor. She is the former US bureau chief of NDTV)
Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author
-
Opinion | Trump's Iran War Is About To Become Someone Else's Problem Soon
Start alone, end alone - that may be the harshest lesson for Trump as he now tries to dash for the door in Iran.
-
What Happens If Iran War Actually Ends In 2 Weeks: The Challenges Ahead
Trump said the war could end in two weeks sans a deal to re-open the Hormuz. Analysts say it could take six to weight weeks more for oil flows to normalise, with each extra week of fighting adding seven to 14 days of recovery.
-
Opinion | Why 2 Gulf States Want Iran War To Continue - Even As They're Battered By It
If Trump withdraws from this war, the UAE, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries would be left to face the music alone, with an angrier, fiercer, and possibly more vengeful Iran.
-
Opinion | Why A 'Defeat' Is Now Essential For The Disoriented Left In Kerala
Power and arrogance have turned the Left in Kerala into what it once fought against. It now needs to lose its last bastion to cleanse itself of its maladies.
-
Opinion | On April Fools' Day, A Reality Check For US, Iran And The World
The paradox is this: Iran wins simply by surviving, while the US must achieve a far more overwhelmingly convincing result to claim success.
-
Opinion | Pakistan, And The One Big Difference Between 'Broker' And 'Mediator'
Neither Washington nor Tehran appears willing to invest Pakistan with the political capital required for mediation.
-
Houthis Threaten Strait No 2 As Iran War Expands. What It Means For India
Yemen's Houthi rebels have opened a second front in the Iran war, threatening Bab al-Mandab just as the Strait of Hormuz comes under pressure, and squeezing one of the world's most important oil corridors from both ends.
-
Europe Split Over Trump's Iran War, Spain Leads Defiance
Europe is sharply divided on how to view fighting in West Asia and subsequent pressure on the global energy trade, which has seen fuel and gas prices increases worldwide.
-
Opinion | Zagros To Dasht-e-Lut, Why Iran's Terrain Could Be A Challenge For US Ground Troops
Iran is often called a 'fortress' owing to its formidable mountain ranges, which virtually form a wall to its North, West and South.
-
More Fighting, Deaths, Oil Prices: 4 Worrying Points If US Invades Iran
In case of a ground invasion, US troops will likely be forced to fight on multiple fronts - Iran proxies Houthis in Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Gaza, as well as smaller Shiite militia in Iraq and Bahrain.