Opinion | Why Trump And Mamdani May Not Be That Different, After All
Both Trump and Mamdani seem to be offering an emotional appeal that targets the same problem: an unaffordable America that has alienated its large majority.
This Thanksgiving, many Americans might be willing to endure an irate Uncle at the dinner table, just the way Zohran Mamdani expected President Donald Trump to be when they met at the White House. The unexpected cordiality instead has had opinions reeling. The premise is more astute. I am reminded of George Soros telling me, over piping hot masala chai on the icy Davos slopes, that "life is a series of imperfect but necessary choices". Both Trump and Mamdani seem to be following this advice. They both offer an emotional appeal that targets the same problem: an unaffordable America that has alienated its large majority.
There is, however, one key difference. Trump's MAGA blames immigrants, while Mamdani's Democratic socialists blame the rich. Both are practising identity politics - one based on your race or place of birth and the other based on your financial success.
But while both indulge in the blame game, neither offers a real, long-term solution. Because there is no easy one. The smartest people in the world are scratching their heads to offer an alternative to the millions whose jobs were displaced in the post-globalisation era, let alone those obliterated by the furiously unfurling AI tsunami. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell recently admitted the inability of the world's largest monetary authority to meet this challenge, saying AI has left job creation close to zero.
The money is firmly in the hands of the super rich. The top 1% of the American population owns nearly a half of the US stock market, while the bottom 50% of Americans altogether hold only 1%. This is the biggest conundrum of our time.
Yes, stock markets and corporate profits are near all time highs, but the vast majority of America is feeling left out in this second coming of the Gilded Age. The beneficiaries of wealth creation in our current times are the rich and Wall Street, not the working class and Main Street.
This disparity has led to a political earthquake in America, and arguably in every country around the world, where the super-rich, through funding political frontrunners or controlling resources, are dictating policies to the vast majority. To win an election in America, you need billionaire support, and they need you to pick up the phone line when they call. Quid pro quo.
This billionaire boys' club is now dominating America's public square. Both Trump and Mamdani are rebuttals by the people. And much like life, their politics are imperfect but necessary choices.
As an immigrant myself, it is hard to get my head around the anti-immigrant policies of Trump's MAGA. But as someone who grew up in the 1980s' pre-liberalisation socialist India, it is also hard to comprehend Mamdani's economics. India's own failed experiment with socialist democracy enabled its oligarchs to gain unchecked power, whose influence even today - whether in politics or business, and irrespective of party in power - is impossible to shirk off.
This political conundrum is both a moral choice for individuals, but also a generational choice testing family loyalties. During the mayoral voting at the American Museum of Natural History, a woman in her 60s told me she had voted for Trump for President but her Ivy League-educated Gen Z sons were voting for Mamdani. She said she voted from her mind, and they voted from their hearts.
That is the dichotomy of most Americans right now. Will you choose the anti-immigrant, MAGA right or the anti-rich Democratic socialists? Ultimately, politics is performance and a promise.
Zohran Mamdani is no stranger to the power of performance. He can marry the charm of DDLJ's Shahrukh Khan in person with the fire of Deewar's Amithabh Bachchan on stage. And in his own way, Donald Trump, the consummate reality TV OG, knows how to stay in the spotlight and dominate the headlines.
Ronald Reagan famously said, "All great change in America begins at the dinner table." As Americans come together this week to celebrate Thanksgiving, families will talk about ideologies that provide answers to their crisis of unaffordability. And they will understand why Donald Trump was surprisingly cordial with Zohran Mamdani.
Both the leaders have ascended for the same reason, promising Americans a return to abundance beyond the Thanksgiving table. But till one of them provides a real solution, Americans will continue to face this challenging conundrum.
(Namrata Brar is an Indian-American journalist, investigative reporter, and news anchor. She is the former US bureau chief of NDTV)
Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author
-
Opinion | Age Of The Pink Slip: India's Brutal IT Layoffs Are No Longer About Cost-Cutting
The four biggest IT firms, TCS, Infosys, HCLTech, and Wipro, removed a net 9,100 people in the April-June quarter this year. A year earlier, in the same quarter, they had added 22,622.
-
Opinion | From Punjab To Karnataka, Congress Just Can't Stop Hitting Self-Goals
Congress leaders often speak as though anti-incumbency is a natural resource that will eventually flow towards them. But it doesn't.
-
NDTV Exclusive - Inside Meta's Child Safety: Current Systems Miss Nuance, New AI Under Test
The tech giant disclosed that it is developing a new generation of AI models to strengthen enforcement against child sexual exploitation on Facebook and Instagram.
-
Opinion | The Story Of 'SH-15', Pakistan's New Chinese Guns, Now Along India's Borders
Pakistan has reportedly deployed nearly 250 Chinese-made SH-15 wheeled self-propelled howitzers along sectors facing India.
-
Explained: Why Meta Is Under Fire Over Child Sexual Abuse Content
Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg apologised to the Indian government over child sexual abuse material, deepfake content and operational lapses. Here's what triggered the controversy and why it could reshape the debate over platform accountability and 'safe harbour' protections in India.
-
Opinion | Bankipur, And Why The Most Dangerous Voter Is The One Who Thinks Again
Bankipur is like the NOIDA of Uttar Pradesh. Its voter list isn't like the rest of Bihar. Which is why one must be careful in declaring Kishor's win a phenomenon - yet. But then, there's the power of the voter...
-
Russia's 'Human Safaris' Are Bringing Terror To Ukraine's Frontline Cities
Kherson is among the first places where Russian forces began using short-range FPV drones against civilians. Equipped with live-streaming cameras, the aircraft allow operators to observe targets in real time and make decisions moments before impact.
-
Opinion | Prashant Kishor May Just Be Playing Two Games At Once In Bihar
The Jan Suraaj is neither a 'BJP-lite' option for disaffected upper-caste voters, nor is it an RJD alternative for Muslims. It is, in fact, both things at once, in the same seat, in the same election.
-
Opinion | Inside The Cabinet Drama That Has Shaken The Congress In Karnataka
Siddaramaiah's decision to 'boycott' the swearing-in ceremony because of a perceived 'insult' is a story in itself.